Garcia v. Virga

Filing 30

ORDER DENYING Petitioner's Motion for Ruling on Petition 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/5/16. (Hellings, J)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

PAUL CARLOS GARCIA,

5

Petitioner,

6
7

No. 1:13-cv-00448-SKO HC
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR RULING ON PETITION

v.
TIM VIRGA, Warden,
(Doc. 29)

8

Respondent.

9
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

10
11

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, moves for a ruling on his petition.1 Respondent has not filed

12

opposition or consent.

13

A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of cases with economy

14

of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248,

15

251-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). Because of the large

16
volume of habeas petitions and limited Court resources, the petition in this case will be addressed
17
18

in due course.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for ruling on his petition is hereby DENIED.

19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 5, 2016

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), both parties consented, in writing, to the jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment.

1