Shaw v. A. B. Brar, Inc. et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for all Defendants to Respond to Complaint and Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/25/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/2/2013 is CONTINUED to 8/7/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin.(Martinez, A)

5

Thomas E. Campagne #065375
Mary F. Lerner #235951
Campagne, Campagne & Lerner
A Professional Corporation
Airport Office Center
1685 North Helm Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

1
2
3
4

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER
A PROF. CORP.
AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER
1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

CECIL SHAW,

) Case No. 1:13-CV-00457-LJO-GSA
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
) EXTENDING TIME FOR ALL
vs.
) DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
) COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING
A.B. BRAR, INC., a California
) MANDATORY SCHEDULING
corporation, dba TINY MART #1; 3441 ) CONFERENCE
SOUTH WILLOW INVESTMENTS, L.P., )
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
)
PARTNERSHIP;
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Cecil Shaw (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants A.B. Brar,

2

Inc., a California corporation dba Tiny Mart #1, and 3441 South Willow Investment, L.P.,

3

a California Limited Partnership (collectively “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff,

4

“the Parties”) stipulated to an extension of time wherein Defendants’ response to the

5

Complaint is currently due on or before July 1, 2013;

6

WHEREAS, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for July

7

2, 2013, and the Mandatory Joint Scheduling Conference Statement must therefore be

8

filed on or before June 25, 3013;

9

WHEREAS, the parties are involved in meaningful settlement negotiations

10

and wish to avoid incurring additional fees and unnecessarily utilizing judicial resources

11

while they explore, and hopefully finalize, a settlement.

12
13
14

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel,
hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

To an additional extension of time for Defendants to respond to the

15

Complaint herein, through and including July 19, 2013, which extension exceeds the

16

maximum 28 days permissible without leave of Court; and

17

2.

That the mandatory scheduling conference currently set for July 2,

18

2013 be continued to a date after July 26, 2013, at the Court’s convenience.

19

Dated: June 21, 2013

20
21

By /s/ Mary F. Lerner
Mary F. Lerner
Attorneys for Defendants A.B. Brar, Inc. dba Tiny
Mart #1; 3441 South Willow Investment, L.P.,
Partnership

22
23
24

Campagne, Campagne & Lerner
A Professional Corporation

Dated: June 21, 2013

Moore Law Firm, P.C.

25
26
27
28
CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER
A PROF. CORP.
AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER
1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

By /s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Shaw

1

ORDER

2

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that Defendants’ response to the Complaint herein is now due on or before

4

July 19, 2013.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently

6

set for July 2, 2013 is continued to August 7, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 10. The

7

Scheduling Conference Statement is to be filed no less than seven (7) days prior to the

8

date of the conference.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CAMPAGNE, CAMPAGNE & LERNER
A PROF. CORP.
AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER
1685 NORTH HELM AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Dated:

June 25, 2013

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

6i0kij8d