Kenya Darrick Caldwell v. City of Selma et al
Filing
89
ORDER re Basic Competency, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/15. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment by April 1, 2015. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENYA DARRICK CALDWELL,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:13-cv-00465-SAB
ORDER RE BASIC COMPETENCY
v.
(ECF No. 88)
CITY OF SELMA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Ever Jean Kelley filed this action as conservator for Plaintiff Kenya Darrick Caldwell on
18 March 28, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for
19 summary judgment, filed January 26, 2015.
20
Ms. Evers terminated her relationship with counsel in this action and is currently
21 proceeding pro se. Therefore on January 29, 2015, an order issued requiring Ms. Evers to submit
22 documentation for the Court to determine if she met basic competency requirements to represent
23 Plaintiff’s interests in this action. On February 23, 2015, Ms. Evers filed a resume setting forth
24 her education and work experience.
25
Ms. Evers received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Home Economics from Fresno State
26 University in 1999. She has a work history in sales, including initiating contracts with potential
27 clients, maintaining inventory and price controls, and ensuring customer satisfaction. Based
28 upon Ms. Evers education and employment history, the Court finds that Ms. Evers possesses
1
1 basic competency requirements to represent Plaintiff’s interests in this action.
Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment by
2
3 April 1, 2015 in compliance with the February 18, 2015 order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
February 24, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?