Emmons et al v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filing
59
ORDER Thereon Granting Stipulation (Doc. 58) Regarding Further Proceedings on Removal and Remand. In view of the parties stipulation, and good cause existing therefore, the Court hereby orders as follows: a) Defendants may file an amended notice of removal along with supplemental evidence supporting jurisdiction by June 30, 2015; b) If after evaluating Defendants amended notice Plaintiffs continue to challenge jurisdiction, they will file a motion for remand by July 21, 2015; c) Plaintiffs moti on for remand, if filed, will proceed as a regular motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) and the Courts scheduling calendar, with Defendants having the opportunity to submit an opposition to the motion and Plaintiffs having the opportunity to submit a reply in connection with the motion in accordance with the applicable rules and standards. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/11/2015. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DOROTHEA EMMONS and LISA
STAPLETON, individually, and on behalf of
other members of the general public similarly
situated, and as aggrieved employees,
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
18
19
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL
LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
INCORPORATED, doing business as QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED OF
NEVADA, a Nevada corporation; QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE, a
California corporations; DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. Case No. 1:13-cv-00474-AWI-BAM
ORDER THEREON GRANTING
STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS ON REMOVAL AND
REMAND
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ACTIVE 207510681v.1
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
ORDER
1
In view of the parties’ stipulation, and good cause existing therefore, the Court hereby orders
2
3
as follows:
a) Defendants may file an amended notice of removal along with supplemental evidence
4
supporting jurisdiction by June 30, 2015;
5
b) If after evaluating Defendants amended notice Plaintiffs continue to challenge
6
jurisdiction, they will file a motion for remand by July 21, 2015;
7
c) Plaintiffs motion for remand, if filed, will proceed as a regular motion pursuant to
8
Local Rule 230(c) and the Court’s scheduling calendar, with Defendants having the
9
10
opportunity to submit an opposition to the motion and Plaintiffs having the
11
opportunity to submit a reply in connection with the motion in accordance with the
12
applicable rules and standards.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ACTIVE 207510681v.1
May 11, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?