Emmons et al v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filing
72
Stipulation and PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/4/2015. Please NOTE the new case number for all future filings - 1:13-cv-00474-DAD-BAM. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Robert Drexler (SBN 119119)
Robert.Drexler@Capstonelawyers.com
Stan Karas (SBN 222402)
Stan.Karas@capstonelawyers.com
Bevin Allen Pike (SBN 221936)
Bevin.Pike@capstonelawyers.com
Jonathan Lee (SBN 267146)
Jonathan.Lee@capstonelawyers.com
Capstone Law APC
1840 Century Park East, Suite 450
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel: (310) 556-4811 / Fax: (310) 943-0396
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
12
Jonathan M. Brenner, SBN 162366
jbrenner@sidley.com
Erica C. Parks, SBN 273893
eparks@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Tel: (213) 896-6000 / Fax: (213) 896-6600
13
Attorneys for Defendants
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
DOROTHEA EMMONS and LISA
STAPLETON, individually, and on behalf of
other members of the general public similarly
situated, and as aggrieved employees,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs,
v.
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL
LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
INCORPORATED, doing business as QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED OF
NEVADA, a Nevada corporation; QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE, a
California corporations; DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
) Case No. 1:13-cv-00474-DAD-BAM
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
WHEREAS Plaintiffs Dorothea Emmons and Lisa Stapleton (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Defendant” and, together with Plaintiffs,
the “parties” or, separately, a “party”), have commenced discovery in the above captioned matter;
WHEREAS disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve the potential
production of confidential, private, proprietary, and/or trade secret or other sensitive business
information that warrants special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose
other than prosecuting and defending this litigation.
WHEREAS, subject to and without waiving any objections any Party may have as to the
discoverability of any information, and without waiving any objections or legal claims any Party
may have (including but not limited to any objections or legal claims arising out of the acquisition,
retention, or other handling of documents containing confidential or proprietary information), the
Parties desire to agree to procedures for the exchange, handling and protection of “Confidential
Information” as defined herein;
WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that the following Proposed Stipulated Protective
Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the
protection it affords extends only to information and items that are confidential and that: (1) are
protected by the right of privacy or a statutory protection of confidentiality, (2) are proprietary or (3)
contain trade secrets;
WHEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(e) and 26, the Parties, by
and through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following Stipulation and respectfully move
the Court to approve the Stipulation as a Protective Order:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION
1.
“Confidential Information,” as used herein, means any type or classification of
information, whether it be a document, information contained in a document, information revealed
during a deposition, information revealed in an interrogatory answer, or otherwise, which is not
generally known to the public, which the designating party (the “Designating Party”) maintains in
confidence by itself or with others, and which is commercially sensitive, trade secret, proprietary,
and/or private.
1
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2.
Information” where the party exercises reasonable discretion in making the designation and where
the designation is made upon a good faith belief that such information may reasonably be considered
“Confidential Information” as defined herein. Mass, indiscriminate or reutilized designations are
improper and the parties do not waive the right to challenge any other party’s designation.
3.
marking original documents, the Designating Party may mark copies that are produced or
exchanged. Marking or stamping “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” on a label on any electronic
storage medium shall designate the entire contents of such electronic storage medium as
Confidential Information.
4.
a. Attorneys of record for the Parties;
b. Paralegals, secretaries, and/or process servers regularly employed by the
17
Parties’ counsel of record;
18
c. Plaintiffs and Defendants, including their employees;
19
d. Experts or paid consultants regarding this litigation; and
20
23
24
25
26
27
In accordance with the limitations and procedures set forth below, access to the
Confidential Information shall be limited to the following persons or parties:
16
22
A party to this action may designate information as Confidential Information by
marking the page or electronic file or medium: “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” In lieu of
15
21
Any party to this action may designate Confidential Information as “Confidential
e. Third party percipient/fact witnesses in this litigation.
5.
All persons designated in paragraph 4.d and 4.e who, in the course of this action, may
be given access to Confidential Information, shall be required to read the Stipulation and agree to be
bound thereby by executing the “Acknowledgment and Agreement To Be Bound By Protective
Order,” attached hereto as Exhibit A. The original Acknowledgments will be maintained by the
party providing access to the Confidential Information and shall be produced upon reasonable
request. Notwithstanding Paragraph 4, although Plaintiffs and percipient witnesses may be provided
access to Confidential Information for review, the parties agree that Plaintiffs and percipient
28
2
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
witnesses will not be given possession, temporarily or otherwise, of copies of Confidential
Information.
6.
Any responses to interrogatories, requests for admissions, or demands for inspection
and pleadings that disclose the content of Confidential Information shall be restricted and marked as
Confidential Information.
7.
Confidential Information produced or disclosed by a party shall be used by the
receiving party solely for the purposes of this action and not for any other purpose. This Stipulation
and Protective Order is not intended to contravene Rule 1-500(A) of the California Rule of
Professional Conduct and Model Rules of Professional Conduct 5.6.
8.
If Confidential Information is disclosed during a deposition or in other pretrial or trial
proceedings, counsel of record for the receiving party shall make arrangements, or when appropriate
request the Court to make arrangements, to ensure that only the deponent, counsel for the deponent,
court reporter, and Qualified Persons identified in Paragraph 4 above, are present, and ask that the
transcript or exhibits containing Confidential Information, or portions thereof, be bound separately
and marked “Confidential - Subject to Protective Order.”
9.
Nothing contained in this Stipulation shall be construed to prejudice the rights of a
party to use before the Court, arbitrator, or mediator any Confidential Information. However, before
doing so, the party intending to use Confidential Information shall so inform the other party and
request from the Court, arbitrator, or mediator appropriate protection for the Confidential
Information. The proponent of the sealing or redaction of any document to be filed with the Court
shall file a “Request to Seal Documents” pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 140 and 141.
10.
Nothing in this Stipulation shall abridge the rights of any party to seek judicial review
or to pursue other appropriate judicial action with respect to any ruling made by the Court
concerning the issue of the confidential status of the Confidential Information.
11.
Any objections as to the admissibility of the Confidential Information are reserved
and are not waived by any terms of this Stipulation and Order.
12.
This Stipulation and Order shall not prejudice the right of the Parties: (a) to object to
any request to produce Confidential Information; (b) to object to the introduction into evidence of
3
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
any Confidential Information; (c) to seek additional protective treatment for any Confidential
Information; (d) to object to the designation of documents as Confidential Information; or (e) to seek
any modification of any provision of this Stipulation and Order either generally or as to any
particular Confidential Information by properly noticed motion. The Parties shall meet and confer
regarding any dispute that refers or relates to Confidential Information prior to filing any motion.
13.
The parties agree that the designating party’s legal remedies are inadequate to prevent
the use or disclosure of Confidential Information covered by this Stipulation. Therefore, the Parties
agree that injunctive relief is an appropriate remedy to prevent any person or party from using or
disclosing Confidential Information in violation of this Stipulation and Order. In the event a party,
or any other person or entity, violates or threatens to violate any of the terms of this Stipulation and
Order, the Parties agree that the designating party, with appropriate notice, may apply to the Court to
obtain injunctive relief against any such persons or parties violating or threatening to violate any of
the terms of this Stipulation. In the event the designating party applies to the Court to obtain
injunctive relief, the responding party, person or entity subject to the provisions of this Stipulation
and Order shall not employ as a defense thereto a claim that the designating party possesses an
adequate remedy at law. The Parties and any other persons subject to the terms of this Stipulation
and Order agree that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over them for the purpose of enforcing this
order. The Parties waive and release any and all requirements for a bond or undertaking to support
any injunctive relief.
14.
Inadvertent disclosure of any Confidential Information during discovery, arbitration,
mediation or trial of this action, or inadvertent disclosure of Confidential Information without
appropriate designation, shall be without prejudice to any claim that such material is private and
confidential and no party shall be held to have waived any rights of confidentiality by such
inadvertent disclosure.
15.
If Confidential Information is disclosed to any persons other than in the manner
authorized by this Stipulation and Order, the person or party responsible for disclosure must
immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of counsel for all
28
4
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
parties without prejudice to other rights and remedies of any party and make every effort to prevent
further disclosure by it or by the person who receives such information.
3
4
16.
be decided by the Court, after opportunity for briefing and argument by the Parties.
5
6
7
8
9
10
17.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
This Stipulation is intended to regulate the handling of the Confidential Information during the
entirety of this litigation through appeal and thereafter, and shall remain in full force and effect until
modified, superseded or terminated on the record or by agreement of the Parties to this litigation and
any pertinent third parties or by order of the Court.
18.
22
23
24
25
26
27
Within thirty five (35) days after the final disposition of the proceeding, whether
through final judgment or otherwise (including all appeals), counsel for the Parties and any person
authorized by the Stipulation to receive Confidential Information shall return or destroy all originals
and copies of documents relating or referring to the Confidential Information, except that only the
Parties’ attorneys of record shall be entitled to retain pleadings, memoranda, declarations or
affidavits, written responses to discovery requests, responses to requests for admission, or deposition
transcripts that contain or refer to any Confidential Information to the extent necessary to preserve a
litigation file in this case. Confidential Information in such litigation files shall remain sealed and
disclosed only in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation and Order.
20
21
This Stipulation may be amended by the written agreement of counsel for the Parties
to this agreement in the form of an amended stipulation and pursuant to a further order of the Court.
11
12
Sanctions for disclosure of Confidential Information contrary to the terms herein shall
19.
The terms of this Stipulation shall survive and remain in full force and effect after
termination of this lawsuit. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties, their attorneys and all
other persons to whom Confidential Information has been disclosed for the purpose of enforcing the
terms of this Stipulation and Order.
//
//
//
//
28
5
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Dated: December 3, 2015
2
CAPSTONE LAW APC
3
4
By:
Robert Drexler
Stan Karas
Bevin Allen Pike
Jonathan Lee
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dorothea Emmons and
Lisa Stapleton
8
9
10
Dated: December 3, 2015
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
11
12
13
By: /s/ Erica C. Parks
Jonathan M. Brenner
Erica C. Parks
14
Attorneys for Defendants Quest Diagnostics
Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics
Incorporated of Nevada, and Quest Diagnostics
Nichols Institute
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
3
I, ______________________ [print or type full name] of _______________
4
5
________________[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its
6
entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District
7
Court for the Eastern District of California on ____________, 2015 in the case of Emmons et al. v.
8
Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-00474-AWI-BAM. I agree to
9
comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand
10
and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to punishment in the nature of contempt.
11
I promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this
12
Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of
13
this Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
14
15
Eastern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective
16
Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
I hereby appoint _______________ [print or type full name] of
17
18
________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my
19
California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to
20
enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
21
22
Date:
23
City and State where sworn and signed:
24
Printed name:
25
Signature:
26
27
28
7
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
ORDER
1
The Court, having read and considered the Stipulated Protective Order regarding the
2
3
protection of Confidential Information, including but not limited to the contact information of former
4
employees, and good cause appearing in that discovery in this action will be facilitated thereby,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order is entered in this
5
6
action without prejudice to any motion for modification.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
December 4, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?