Dhaliwal et al v. Singh et al
Filing
216
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/23/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
JAGJEEVAN K. DHALIWAL, an Individual
11 and MOHINDER S. GILL, an Individual,
Case No. 1:13-CV-00484
12 Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT
TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41 AND
ORDER
13
14
vs.
15 KS CHANDI & SONS, INC., a California
16 Corporation, and CHANDI BROTHERS, LLC, a
17
California Limited Liability Corporation.
18
19
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties
to this action, through their respective attorneys, that pursuant to Rules 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of
22
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each
23
party to bear any remaining costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Settlement
24
Agreement and Mutual Release (“Settlement Agreement”). This stipulation is signed by
25
counsel for all parties in this action. This Court will retain jurisdiction for the purpose of
26
enforcing the Settlement Agreement.
27
28
Case No. 1:13-CV-00484 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AND ORDER
Page | 1
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
Dated: March 17, 2016
________________________
Lee Durst, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
JAGJEEVAN K. DHALIWAL and
MOHINDER S. GILL
4
5
6
7
8
/s/ Lee Durst
Dated: March 22, 2016
9
/s/ Marc Robinson
________________________
Marc Robinson, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
KS CHANDI & SONS, INC. and
CHANDI BROTHERS, LLC
10
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 23, 2016
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 1:13-CV-00484 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AND ORDER
Page | 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?