Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE the Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 9/24/2013, is CONTINUED to 11/12/2013, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/12/2013. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 Michael K. Brown (SBN 104252) mkbrown@reedsmith.com 2 Mildred Segura (SBN 210850) msegura@reedsmith.com 3 REED SMITH LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 4 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone:213.457.8000 5 Facsimile: 213.457.8080 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 6 Courtland C. Chillingworth (SBN 261140) cchillingworth@reedsmith.com 7 REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 8 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.543.8700 9 Facsimile: 415.391.8269 10 Attorneys for Defendants Medtronic, Inc. and 11 Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARY HAWKINS, 15 16 No.: 1:13-cv-00499 AWI SKO Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25) 17 MEDTRONIC, INC.; MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR 18 DANEK USA, INC., 19 20 Defendants. Compl. Filed: April 4, 2013 Honorable Sheila K. Oberto 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25) 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 The Parties’ Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for 4 September 24, 2013, in this matter shall be continued to November 12, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?