Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE the Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 9/24/2013, is CONTINUED to 11/12/2013, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/12/2013. (Timken, A)
1 Michael K. Brown (SBN 104252)
mkbrown@reedsmith.com
2 Mildred Segura (SBN 210850)
msegura@reedsmith.com
3 REED SMITH LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900
4 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:213.457.8000
5 Facsimile: 213.457.8080
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
6 Courtland C. Chillingworth (SBN 261140)
cchillingworth@reedsmith.com
7 REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
8 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.543.8700
9 Facsimile: 415.391.8269
10 Attorneys for Defendants
Medtronic, Inc. and
11 Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARY HAWKINS,
15
16
No.: 1:13-cv-00499 AWI SKO
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25)
17
MEDTRONIC, INC.; MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR
18 DANEK USA, INC.,
19
20
Defendants.
Compl. Filed:
April 4, 2013
Honorable Sheila K. Oberto
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25)
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
2
The Parties’ Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for
4 September 24, 2013, in this matter shall be continued to November 12, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 12, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–1–
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. 25)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?