Chitwood v. Gipson et al
Filing
20
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT to Provide Copies of State Court Records Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/20/2013. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Case No. 1:13-cv-00502 AWI MJS (HC)
JEFFREY PAUL CHITWOOD,
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO
Petitioner, PROVIDE COPIES OF STATE COURT
RECORDS
12
13
v.
14
15
GIPSON, Warden,
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On September 18, 2013, Petitioner filed a motion to stay
20
the habeas corpus proceeding pending state exhaustion, and he filed a first amended
21
petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF Nos. 16-17.) Respondent filed an opposition to
22
the motion to stay on October 8, 2013, and Petitioner filed a reply on October 21, 2013.
23
(ECF No. 18-19.)
24
During the pendency of this federal petition, and prior to filing the motion to stay,
25
Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition with the California Supreme Court. In re
26
Chitwood, Cal. Sup. Ct. Case No. S212988. The petition was denied on November 13,
27
2013. Without copies of all of Petitioner's state filings, this Court cannot determine which
28
claims of the petition have been exhausted. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS
1
1
Respondent to provide the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of issuance of this
2
order, a copy of the record of Case No. S212988, and any other state pleadings not
3
previously provided to this Court. See Rule 7, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases
4
(Court may direct the parties to expand the record).
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
November 20, 2013
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
10
Michael J. Seng
ci4d6
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?