Chitwood v. Gipson et al

Filing 20

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT to Provide Copies of State Court Records Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/20/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Case No. 1:13-cv-00502 AWI MJS (HC) JEFFREY PAUL CHITWOOD, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO Petitioner, PROVIDE COPIES OF STATE COURT RECORDS 12 13 v. 14 15 GIPSON, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On September 18, 2013, Petitioner filed a motion to stay 20 the habeas corpus proceeding pending state exhaustion, and he filed a first amended 21 petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF Nos. 16-17.) Respondent filed an opposition to 22 the motion to stay on October 8, 2013, and Petitioner filed a reply on October 21, 2013. 23 (ECF No. 18-19.) 24 During the pendency of this federal petition, and prior to filing the motion to stay, 25 Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition with the California Supreme Court. In re 26 Chitwood, Cal. Sup. Ct. Case No. S212988. The petition was denied on November 13, 27 2013. Without copies of all of Petitioner's state filings, this Court cannot determine which 28 claims of the petition have been exhausted. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS 1 1 Respondent to provide the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of issuance of this 2 order, a copy of the record of Case No. S212988, and any other state pleadings not 3 previously provided to this Court. See Rule 7, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases 4 (Court may direct the parties to expand the record). 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 November 20, 2013 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END: 10 Michael J. Seng ci4d6 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?