Puckett v. Vogel et al

Filing 14

ORDER Denying 11 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/27/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DURRELL A. PUCKETT, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 SGT. RONALD VOGEL, et al., 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-00525-SKO (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 11) Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 12, 2013. On July 8, 2014, the Court 18 screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint and found that it stated cognizable federal excessive force 19 and equal protection claims against eleven defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court ordered 20 Plaintiff to complete and return the service documents so that service of process could be initiated. 21 The order was filed on July 9, 2014, the same day on which Plaintiff filed a motion seeking 22 leave to amend, accompanied by a proposed second amended complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 23 Plaintiff’s motion to amend, however, fails to identify what “ground for relief” he is adding. 24 (Doc. 11.) The party seeking relief bears the burden of stating “with particularity the grounds for” 25 the motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B). The Court does not have a duty to compare Plaintiff’s 26 27 28 1 complaints side and side and attempt to deduce what new grounds for relief were added, and it 2 declines to do so.1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to file a second amended complaint is 3 4 HEREBY DENIED, without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B). 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8 July 27, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 It bears mention that the complaints are in different formats, making the task of ascertaining the changes even more difficult. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?