Puckett v. Vogel et al

Filing 75

ORDER Extending Application Of Discovery And Scheduling Order To Defendant Abadia (Docs. 21 and 74 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/12/2015. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

SGT. RONALD VOGEL, et al.,

14

Case No. 1:13-cv-00525-AWI-SKO (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
TO DEFENDANT ABADIA
(Docs. 21 and 74)

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

15
16

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 12, 2013. This action for damages is
18 proceeding on Plaintiff’s amended complaint against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, and Johnson for
19 retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, Johnson,
20 Dean, Bolander, Abadia, Lockhart, Zamora, Sisneros, Campos, and Callow for excessive force in
21 violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Sanchez, Vogel, and Johnson for
22 violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

On August 11, 2015, the final defendant to appear, Abadia, filed an answer to Plaintiff’s

1

2 amended complaint. Accordingly, application of the discovery and scheduling order filed on
3 January 30, 2015, is HEREBY EXTENDED to Defendant Abadia.1
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

6

August 12, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Defendant Abadia admits Plaintiff exhausted his claim against her and therefore, it is unnecessary to extend the nowexpired exhaustion motion deadline. (Doc. 74, ¶2.)

2