Paul Weldon v. Dyer et al

Filing 104

ORDER CONTINUING Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Submit to Independent Medical Examination, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/6/2015. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL WELDON, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT TO INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION v. JERY DYER, et al., Defendants. ECF NO. 88 16 17 On January 20, 2015, Defendants in this action filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to 18 submit to an independent medical examination pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. 19 (ECF No. 88.) On February 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order against any 20 such independent medical examination. (ECF No. 95.) 21 Defendants’ motion is scheduled to be heard on March 11, 2015. Plaintiff’s motion is 22 scheduled to be heard on March 25, 2015. Since the matters embraced in these motions are 23 related, the Court will continue the hearing on Defendants’ motion and hear both on March 25, 24 2015. At the hearing, the Court will also address whether a continuance of the deadline for 25 expert discovery is warranted. 26 The Court further orders the parties to prepare a Joint Statement re Discovery 27 Disagreement, as required by Local Rule 251. The parties’ Joint Statement re Discovery 28 Disagreement shall be filed no later than March 18, 2015. 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff to submit to an 3 independent medical examination is CONTINUED from March 11, 2015 to 4 March 25, 2015; and 2. 5 The parties shall file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement on or before March 18, 2015. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 6, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?