Paul Weldon v. Dyer et al
Filing
34
ORDER Denying Motions for Entry of Default 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/4/14. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL WELDON,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR ENTRY
OF DEFAULT
v.
ECF NO. 30, 31, 32, 33
14
15
JERRY DYER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On January 27, 2014, Plaintiff Paul Weldon (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se in this action,
18 filed motions for entry of default against Defendant Econo Towing as well as against Beryle
19 Dodson, Marty Kodman and Robert Kodman. (ECF No. 30, 31, 32, 33.)
20
Beryle Dodson, Marty Kodman and Robert Kodman are not parties to this action.
21 Plaintiff contends that these individuals were identified as “John Doe” defendants in the Second
22 Amended Complaint. However, Plaintiff did not properly substitute these individuals for the
23 John Doe defendants named in the Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, nothing in the
24 Second Amended Complaint or on the Court’s docket gave these individuals proper notice that
25 they were parties to this action. Plaintiff’s attempt to serve them prematurely was defective. If
26 Plaintiff wishes to add these individuals as parties to this action, he must file a motion to amend
27 his complaint to substitute these individuals in place of the John Doe defendants named in the
28 Second Amended Complaint.
1
Moreover, even if these individuals were properly substituted as parties in this action, the
1
2 “Return of Service” forms filed by Plaintiff suggest that Plaintiff’s attempt to serve these
3 individuals was defective. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e), an individual may be
4 served by (1) delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual
5 personally, (2) leaving a copy of each at the individual’s dwelling or usual place of abode with
6 someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there, (3) delivering a copy of each to an
7 agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process, or (4) any other method
8 authorized by California law.
The Return of Service form submitted by Plaintiff only states that Beryle Dodson, Marty
9
10 Kodman and Robert Kodman were served when the process server “left with receptionist sitting
11 at front desk at Econo Towing office location 1523 N. Maple, Fresno, CA 93703.1” Under
12 California law, substituted service of process in lieu of personal delivery is only permitted “if a
13 copy of the summons and of the complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally
14 delivered to the person to be served.” Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 415.20(b). Plaintiff has not
15 submitted any proof of reasonably diligent efforts to serve these individuals personally.
16 Accordingly, the attempt at substituted service was ineffective. Moreover, substituted service
17 requires Plaintiff to also mail a copy of the summons and complaint by first-class mail, postage
18 prepaid, to the person and address where substituted service was attempted. Cal. Code Civ. Proc.
19 § 415.20(b). Plaintiff has not submitted proof of such mail delivery.
Plaintiff’s proof of service with respect to Econo Towing is also defective. Plaintiff has
20
21 not submitted any proof of service demonstrating proper service with respect to Econo Towing.
22 To the extent that Plaintiff attempted substituted service on Econo Towing pursuant to California
23 law, Plaintiff has not demonstrated the prerequisite “reasonable diligence” or that Plaintiff
24 mailed the summons and complaint to the proper address.
25 / / /
26 / / /
27
1
The Return of Service for Beryle Dodson does not indicate that the summons and complaint was left with the
28 receptionist. It is unclear how service was effectuated with respect to Beryle Dodson.
2
1
Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for entry of
2 default are DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 4, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?