Paul Weldon v. Dyer et al

Filing 87

ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations 86 and DENYING 79 Motion to Strike, Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/3/2014. (Arellano, S.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

PAUL WELDON,
Plaintiff,

5
6
7

Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
ECF NO. 79, 86
JERRY DYER, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9

On October 24, 2014, the magistrate judge assigned to this action issued a Findings and
10

Recommendations recommending that Defendant’s motion to strike be denied. (ECF No. 86.)

11
The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within
12
thirty (30) days. To date, no party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
13
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
14
a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
15
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
16
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1.

The October 24, 2014 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL

18
(ECF No. 86); and
19
2.

Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED.

20
21 IT IS SO ORDERED.
22

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

December 3, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

1