Arcure, et al. v. Meeker, et al.

Filing 194

STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal of certain parties signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/10/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

LAWRENCE J. KING (BAR NO. 120805)
Law Offices of Lawrence J. King
11 Western Avenue
Petaluma, CA 94952
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

FRESNO DIVISION

9
10
11

YVONNE ARCURE, KEVIN COOK,
JOSEPH FESSENDEN, LISA HUFF &
KATHREN WOODSIDE,

12

15
16
17

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED
ORDER

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No. 1:13-cv-00541-MJS

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES,
DEBORAH MEEKER, JEFFREY BRADLEY,
SCOTT GARDNER, DOUGLAS LOEHNER,
DAVID CORRAL, MICHAEL FLORES, and
MARK RODRIGUEZ,

Judge:
Ctrm:

Hon. Michael J. Seng
6

Case Filed: April 14, 2013
Trial Date: November 17, 2015

Defendants.

18
19

NOW COME THE PARTIES HERETO to notify the Court that Yvonne Arcure and

20

Joseph Fessenden have reached a settlement with all defendants in this case of the claims they

21

have asserted herein and by which they have released any and all claims they may have had

22

against the State of California, its employees, and its agents up to an through the date that

23

settlement was reached, i.e. April 8, 2015. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, each party is to

24

bear their own costs and attorney’s fees.

25

\\

26

\\

27

\\

28

1
THE PARTIES STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

Accordingly, THE PARTIES HERETO hereby request that the Court dismiss with

2

prejudice YVONNE ARCURE AND JOSEPH FESSENDEN’S claims in this case. Further,

3

the parties request that Defendants Douglas Loehner and Michael Flores be dismissed with

4

prejudice. This dismissal has no effect or legal impact on the claims of the remaining plaintiff,

5

Kevin Cook.

6
7

Dated: July 10, 2015

8

Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE J. KING

9
10
By: /s/_______________________________________
Lawrence J. King
Attorney For Plaintiffs

11
12
13
14
15

Dated: July 10, 2015

16

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: /s/____________________________
Matthew Besmer
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants (Except Jeffrey Bradley)

17
18
19
20
21

ORDER

22

Having reviewed the parties stipulated request for dismissal of Yvonne

23

in

25

and finding good cause therefore, the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice the

26

claims that Plaintiffs Yvonne Arcure & Joseph Fessenden asserted in this case.

28

Joseph

claims

Arcure

27

and

Fessenden’s

24

Case

No.

1:13-cv-00541-MJS

Further, Defendants Douglas Loehner and Michael Flores are dismissed with
2
THE PARTIES STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

1
2

prejudice. This dismissal has no effect or legal impact on the claims of the remaining
plaintiff, Kevin Cook.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated:

July 10, 2015

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
THE PARTIES STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER