Arcure, et al. v. Meeker, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/9/2013. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
Arcure, et al. v. Meeker, et al. Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 YVONNE ARCURE, KEVIN COOK, JOSEPH FESSENDEN, LISA HUFF & KATHREN WOODSIDE, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00541-LJO-BAM ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, DEBORAH MEEKER, JEFFREY BRADLEY, SCOTT GARDNER, DOUGLAS LOEHNER, DAVID CORRAL, MICHAEL FLORES, and MARK RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. 20 21 This case is set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 22 September 19, 2013 at 9:30 am in Courtroom 8 at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, 23 California, 93721. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the 24 case shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full 25 authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms, at the conference. 26 No later than seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit directly to 27 Judge McAuliffe’s chambers at bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement conference 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 statement. This statement should neither be filed with the clerk of the Court nor served on any other 2 party. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and time of the 3 mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. 4 The settlement statement should not be lengthy but shall include a brief recitation of the facts, 5 a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case, an estimate of the cost and time to be 6 expended for further pretrial and trial matters, and the relief sought. The parties are also directed to 7 include a candid statement on the party’s position on settlement, including the amount which the 8 party will accept to settle, realistic settlement expectations, present settlement proposals, and a 9 history of past settlement discussions, offers, demands, and a report on settlement efforts to date. 10 This Court will vacate the settlement conference if the Court finds the settlement conference 11 will be neither productive nor meaningful to attempt to resolve all or part of this case. As far in 12 advance of the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and other parties that 13 it believes the case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or reset the settlement 14 conference. Otherwise the parties shall proceed with the settlement conference in good faith to attempt 15 to resolve all or part of the case. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 Dated: August 9, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?