Ekdahl v. Diaz
Filing
41
ORDER to Respondent and His Attorney of Record to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Their Failure to Comply With the Court's Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/29/2015. Show Cause Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EMIL JOSEPH EKDAHL,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
RALPH DIAZ, Warden,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-cv-00542-AWI-JLT
ORDER TO RESPONDENT AND HIS
ATTORNEY OF RECORD TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE
COURT’S ORDER
16
17
On September 3, 2014, the Court ordered Respondent to lodge the entire transcript of
18
Petitioner’s April 24, 2014 parole hearing within thirty days. (Doc. 33). To date, Respondent has not
19
complied with the Court’s order to produce the transcript.
20
On January 20, 2015, Respondent filed his answer along with various exhibits. (Doc. 39). The
21
Answer repeats the argument Respondent first raised in the motion to dismiss, i.e., that the Court lacks
22
habeas jurisdiction because even if the disciplinary hearing were reversed and expunged, it would not
23
necessarily accelerate the date on which Petitioner would be released on parole. However, Respondent
24
has never filed a complete transcript of that April 24, 2014 hearing.
25
ORDER
26
Therefore, within 14 days, Respondent and his attorney of record are ORDERED TO
27
SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the Court’s order
28
1
1
to lodge a complete transcript of the April 24, 2014 parole hearing. Alternatively, within this same 14-
2
day period, Respondent and his counsel may lodge a true and correct copy of the entire April 24, 2014
3
transcript as previously ordered.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?