Marshawn Govan v. City of Clovis et al

Filing 13

ORDER DENYING, without prejudice, plaintiff's motions/requests for pro se access to the electronic case management system, documents 10 and 11 . Plaintiff is further ORDERED to file all documents in this matter in paper format. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/6/2013. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 MARSHAWN GOVAN dba MKG TAX CONSULTANTS, CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00547-LJO-SMS 5 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRO SE ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 CITY OF CLOVIS, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 (Docs. 10 and 11) / 10 By letters directed to the Court, Plaintiff Marshawn Govan, doing business as MKG Tax 11 Consultants, has requested permission for access as a pro se litigant to this district’s electronic 12 case management system (CM/ECF). Local Rule 133(a) presumes that a pro se litigant shall file 13 and serve paper documents as permitted by the Local Rules. To file electronically requires a pro 14 se litigant to secure the permission of the assigned judge or Magistrate Judge. L.R. 133(b)(2). 15 Securing permission requires submission of a request “as [a] stipulatio[n] as provided by L.R. 16 143, or, if a stipulation cannot be had, as [a] written motio[n] setting out an explanation of 17 reasons for the exception.” L.R. 133(b)(3). Plaintiff’s letter request does not comply with the 18 Local Rules’ requirement. 19 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for permission to file electronically is DENIED, without 20 prejudice to his renewing the request at the initial scheduling conference. Pending further order 21 of this Court, Plaintiff is directed to file all documents in this matter in paper. The Clerk of 22 Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: icido3 June 6, 2013 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?