Felix et al v. The State of California et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER re: Filing of Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint. Defendant may file an Amended Answer to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) on or before November 15, 2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/16/2013. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ROBERT FELIX and JACK PHELPS,
individuals,
1:13-cv-00561-LJO-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
Plaintiffs, FILING OF AMENDED ANSWER TO
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
13
14
v.
15
16
17
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES, OFFICE OF PROTECTIVE
SERVICES,
18
Defendant.
19
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered September 16, 2013, the Parties hereby stipulate
20
21
that Defendant may file an Amended Answer to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) on or
22
before November 15, 2013. The amendment alleges one additional affirmative defense and does
23
not require any modification to the existing scheduling order. Furthermore, the parties agree that
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
Stipulation and Order Re: Filing of Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint (1:13-cv-00561-LJO-SKO)
1
the amendment is not prejudicial to plaintiffs, not the product of undue delay, not proposed in bad
2
faith and is not futile.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
Dated: October 16, 2013
LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN SCHWIN
5
By: /s/ Kevin M. Schwin
6
Kevin Schwin
Attorney for Plaintiffs Robert Felix
and Jack Phelps
7
8
9
Dated: October 16, 2013
10
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: /s/ Mary Horst
11
Mary Horst
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant Department
of Developmental Services
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 16, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation and Order Re: Filing of Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint (1:13-cv-00561-LJO-SKO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?