Felix et al v. The State of California et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE Trial and Pretrial Dates. Non-Expert Discovery due by 2/21/2015. Expert Disclosures due by 3/25/2015. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 4/9/2015. Expert Discovery Deadline: 5/18/2015. Non-Dispositive Moti on Filing Deadline: 6/17/2015. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 6/17/2015. Settlement Conference set for 3/25/2015, at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Pretrial Conference set for 11/4/2015, at 02:00 P M in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Jury Trial set for 1/26/2016, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/18/2014. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 ROBERT FELIX and JACK PHELPS, individuals, AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER Plaintiffs, TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES; ORDER THEREON 21 22 23 24 25 26 1:13-cv-00561- SKO v. Judge: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, OFFICE OF PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Complaint Filed: The Honorable Sheila K. Oberto April 17, 2013 Defendant. 27 28 1 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among ROBERT FELIX (“FELIX”) and JACK 2 PHELPS (“PHELPS”) (“Plaintiffs”) and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF 3 DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, INC. (“Defendant” or “Defendant”) (collectively, the 4 “Parties”), through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows: 5 6 WHEREAS, this Court entered the current Scheduling Order in this matter on September 16, 2013 (Court Docket, Document No. 24); 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to consent given by all parties, on August 11, 2014, the Court entered 8 an order re-assigning this matter for all purposes to the Honorable District Court Magistrate Judge 9 Sheila Oberto (Court Docket, Document No. 34); 10 WHEREAS, this is a multi-Plaintiff case where Plaintiffs allege harassment, discrimination, 11 retaliation and disparate treatment in the terms and conditions of employment occurring over the 12 course of approximately 8 years; 13 WHEREAS, the United States Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) 14 received Plaintiffs’ Charges of Discrimination in February of 2008 and conducted an extensive 15 investigation that took the EEOC approximately 4 years to complete; 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs were not issued Right to Sue letters on their February 2008 Charges of Discrimination until 2013; WHEREAS, the Parties’ Rule 26 disclosures identify more than 30 witnesses located all across the State of California and out-of-state; WHEREAS, the Parties have exchanged well over 40,000 pages of documents related to this case; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs propounded written discovery on Defendants in or around January 2014; WHEREAS, Defendant provided initial responses on or about April 22, 2014, after Plaintiffs granted requested response deadline extensions; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant have met and conferred in good faith regarding 27 disputed issues relating to Defendant’s responses to Plaintiffs first sets of interrogatories and 28 Defendant’s Rule 26 disclosures; 2 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 WHEREAS, during the course of the Parties’ meet and confer efforts, Plaintiffs agreed to 2 limit or to modify certain discovery requests, and Defendant agreed to provide various 3 supplemental interrogatory responses and supplemental Rule 26 disclosures responsive to the 4 modified or limited discovery requests; 5 WHEREAS, Defendant has provided additional documents related to the Rule 26 6 disclosures and document requests and some but not all of the agreed-upon supplemental 7 interrogatory responses; 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, Defendant anticipates that based on its discovery responses, a future on-site visit by Plaintiffs may be required in order to review documents potentially responsive to propounded discovery; WHEREAS, during the meet and confer process, the Parties have agreed that additional 12 time will be necessary for the Parties to conduct adequate discovery so that they may evaluate and 13 prepare the case for settlement and/or trial; 14 WHEREAS, neither Party initially scheduled depositions due to scheduling difficulties and 15 the need to complete certain written discovery and to review many thousands of pages of 16 documents prior to taking depositions; 17 18 19 WHEREAS, Defendant is currently taking Plaintiff Jack Phelps’ deposition and has scheduled Plaintiff Robert Felix’ deposition for August 14 and 15; WHEREAS, given the number of alleged discriminatory and retaliatory events over the 20 course of 8 years, Defendant is unsure if it can complete Plaintiffs’ depositions within the agreed 21 upon 12 hours over two days but is trying to the best of its ability to do so; 22 23 WHEREAS, the following depositions (some of which conflict as to time and/or location) have been noticed by the parties and scheduled as follows: 24 DEPONENT DEPOSITION DAY AND TIME JACK PHELPS August 7, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. JACK PHELPS August 8, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. ROBERT FELIX August 14, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 25 26 27 28 3 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 DEPONENT DEPOSITION DAY AND TIME ROBERT FELIX August 15, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. SCOTT GARDNER August 18, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. JEFF BRADLEY August 18, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. CARLOS MARTINEZ August 18, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. KEVIN COOK August 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. LISA HUFF August 19, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. KATHY WOODSIDE August 19, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. 10 JAMES RODRIGUEZ August 20, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 11 RAMONA PHELPS August 20, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. 12 JOANN FELIX August 20, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. 13 DAN DILLARD August 20, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. 14 JOE BOMGARDNER August 21, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 15 BOB LEWIS (Sonoma, California) August 21, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. 16 GENE ALVAREZ August 21, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 17 WHEREAS, Defendant has been notified that at least three of those individuals are 18 currently represented by outside counsel and believes that two other witnesses may also be 19 represented by outside counsel; 20 WHEREAS, Defendant has been informed by the outside counsel for three of the 21 represented witnesses that he will be unable to attend the currently scheduled depositions and will 22 not be able to attend any depositions prior to the current discovery cut off date; 23 WHEREAS, Defendant has been informed by outside counsel for three of the witnesses he 24 will not be available to attend depositions until the end of September due to his unavailability and 25 a pre-scheduled vacation out of the country; 26 27 28 4 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 WHEREAS, Defendant has also been notified that one of the witnesses is no longer located 2 at the last known address on file for the witness and attempts to serve the individual are 3 continuing; 4 WHEREAS, the Parties believe the depositions scheduled by each side will need to be 5 rescheduled due to calendar conflicts and the impossibility of completing most of the depositions 6 within the two to three hours for which they have been scheduled; 7 WHEREAS, it would be inconvenient for the deponents and for counsel to recess their 8 depositions after two to three hours and to reschedule the completion of their depositions for 9 another date that was mutually agreeable to the witnesses and counsel. 10 11 WHEREAS, the Parties have tentatively agreed to engage in private mediation in or about December, 2014 to February, 2015, following the completion of key witness depositions; 12 13 WHEREAS, the Parties will need to schedule dozens of additional non-expert depositions thereafter if the Parties are unable to resolve the case; 14 15 WHEREAS, the Parties will also need to schedule numerous expert depositions thereafter if the Parties are unable to resolve the case; 16 WHEREAS, the Parties agree the complexity of this case, along with the difficulty in 17 scheduling depositions and the other factors described more fully herein constitute good cause 18 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 16(b)(4) for the Court to extend the non-expert 19 discovery deadline in order to complete adequate discovery, and to extend the trial date and/or 20 some or all of the remaining pre-trial dates and deadlines; 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the Parties that all dates and 22 deadlines in the current Scheduling Order shall be extended approximately six months or as close 23 thereto as the Court’s calendar will permit. Should the Court agree to extend all dates, the Parties 24 propose that the current deadlines and dates shall be modified as follows (or as close thereto as 25 the Court’s calendar will permit): 26 // 27 // 28 5 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 EVENT/DEADLINE CURRENT DATE PROPOSED DATES Non-Expert Discovery 08/21/2014 02/21/2015 Expert Disclosure 09/25/2014 03/25/2015 Settlement Conference 09/25/2014 03/25/2015 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure 10/09/2014 04/09/2015 Expert Discovery Deadline 11/18/2014 05/18/2015 Non-Disp. Motion Hearing 12/31/2014 06/17/2015 Dispositive Motion Hearing 12/31/2014 06/17/2015 10 Pre-Trial Conference 05/07/2015 11/07/2015 11 Trial 06/23/2015 1/25/2016 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated: August 11, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF DEAN B. GORDON 16 By: /s/ Dean B. Gordon Dean B. Gordon Attorneys for Plaintiffs Robert Felix and Jack Phelps 17 18 19 20 Dated: August 11, 2014 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 21 By: /s/ Mary Horst Mary Horst Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Department of Developmental Services 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON 1 ORDER 2 The parties stipulated to a modification of the schedule. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that the current Scheduling Order in this case shall be modified and all dates and 4 deadlines shall be continued approximately six months. The new dates and deadlines shall be as 5 follows: 6 EVENT/DEADLINE CURRENT DATE NEW DATE 7 Non-Expert Discovery 08/21/2014 02/21/2015 8 Expert Disclosure 09/25/2014 03/25/2015 9 Settlement Conference 09/25/2014 03/25/2015 10 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure 10/09/2014 04/09/2015 11 Expert Discovery Deadline 11/18/2014 05/18/2015 12 Non-Disp. Motion Filing 12/31/2014 06/17/2015 13 Non-Disp. Motion Hearing 02/11/2015 08/12/2015 Dispositive Motion Filing 12/31/2014 06/17/2015 Dispositive Motion Hearing 03/18/2015 09/16/2015 Pre-Trial Conference 05/07/2015 11/04/2015 Trial 06/23/2015 1/26/2016 14 15 16 17 18 19 The March 25, 2015, settlement conference will be held before U.S. Magistrate Judge 20 Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9 at 1:00 p.m. The Pretrial Conference is continued to November 21 4, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. The trial is continued to January 26, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in 22 Courtroom 7. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2014 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 7 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES (1:13-cv-00561-SKO); ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?