Felix et al v. The State of California et al
Filing
57
ORDER on 56 Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal of Entire Case With Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/7/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
ROBERT FELIX and JACK PHELPS,
9
Case No. 1:13-cv-00561-SKO
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE
WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
10
v.
11
(Doc. 56)
12
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES, OFFICE OF PROTECTIVE
SERVICES,
13
14
15
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
16
ORDER
17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the Court may order an action dismissed at Plaintiffs’
18
19 request on terms the Court considers proper.
The parties having executed all settlement
20 documents, and Defendants having paid to Plaintiff Robert Felix and Jack Phelps all settlement
1
21 funds, Plaintiffs filed a request for dismissal of the entire case with prejudice. (Doc. 56.)
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
24
25
The entire matter is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all Defendants; and
2.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
26
August 7, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Defendants filed no objection to Plaintiffs’ request for dismissal of the action with prejudice. (See Docket.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?