AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance Exchange v. Melgar et al

Filing 51

Order Denying Partial Payment of Interpled Funds Per Stipulation, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/01/2014. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 STANLEY R. PARRISH State Bar No. 137624 2 LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY R. PARRISH 3 Box 302 7862 Winding Way 4 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 (916) 536-0330 5 (916) 961-4363 (fax) email: stan@stanparrishlaw.com 6 7 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. FARLEY Michael J. Farley, Esq. 8 State Bar No. 147584 2280 East Bidwell Street 9 Folsom, CA 95630 10 (916) 417-8830 (916) 941-8308 (fax) 11 email: michaeljfarley@gmail.com 12 Attorneys for Defendants and Cross-Complainants 13 AUDELINO MELGAR and BERTILA MELGAR 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 16 Case No.: 1:13-00562 17 AAA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA NEVADA & UTAH INSURANCE 18 EXCAHNGE, 19 ORDER DENYING PARTIAL PAYMENT OF INTERPLED FUNDS PER STIPULATION Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 AUDELINO MELGAR, ET AL. 22 Defendants. _____________________________________ 23 _____________________________________ __________ 24 AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS 25 26 27 The Court having considered the Stipulation for Partial Release of Interpled Funds between Cross-Defendant CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY (“CMC”), Defendant and 28 Cross-Complainant FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (“Fannie Mae”) and 1 Order Granting Partial Payment of Interpled Funds Per Stipulation 1 Defendants and Cross-Defendants AUDELINO MELGAR and BERTILA MELGAR 2 (collectively referred to as the “Melgars”), for good cause REJECTS the Stipulation at this 3 4 time and without prejudice because it appears that not all the parties to this litigation have so stipulated. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: May 1, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order Granting Partial Payment of Interpled Funds Per Stipulation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?