Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Old Republic Insurance Company, et al

Filing 139

ORDER on Stipulation to Dismiss Defendant Catlin Specialty Insurance Company in Place of Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 100% Syndicate 2020, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/23/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 7 8 9 10 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation; ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY IN PLACE OF CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, 100% SYNDICATE 2020 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 Case No. 1:13-CV-00576-LJO-BAM OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Pursuant to stipulation of Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA (“TRAVELERS”), Defendant CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (“CATLIN”), and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, 100% SYNDICATE 2020 (“LLOYDS”) and good cause existing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant CATLIN, only, be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice from the above-captioned action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and that all allegations against CATLIN in the First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 111] shall be deemed to be alleged against LLOYDS instead. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill October 23, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Case No.: 1:13-CV-00576-LJO-BAM [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CATLIN IN PLACE OF CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, 100% SYNDICATE 2020 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 1:13-CV-00576-LJO-BAM [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CATLIN IN PLACE OF CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, 100% SYNDICATE 2020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?