Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Old Republic Insurance Company, et al

Filing 99

ORDER Re: 95 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 7/3/2013. (Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company shall have up to an including 7/17/2013, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint.)(Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

FRESNO DIVISION

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, )
a Pennsylvania corporation; EVEREST
)
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a
)
Delaware corporation; INTERSTATE FIRE & )
CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois
)
corporation; FINANCIAL PACIFIC
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a California
)
corporation; ARCH SPECIALTY
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska
)
corporation; NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York
)
corporation; CLARENDON NATIONAL
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey
)
corporation; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE )
COMPANY fka ALLIED INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation;
)
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
)
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a
)
Pennsylvania corporation; ASPEN
)
SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a
)
North Dakota corporation; FIRST
)
SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, )
a Missouri corporation; IRONSHORE
)
SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an
)
Arizona corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY
)
INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oklahoma
)
corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
)
PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE )
COMPANY, RRG, a Washington, D.C.
)
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation;

Case No. 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM
The Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (Doc. 95)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

corporation; SECURITY AMERICA RISK
RETENTION GROUP, a Vermont
corporation; ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; ZURICH
NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY, a New York corporation;
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation;
NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NEW YORK, a New York corporation;
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY fka AMERICAN
INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois
corporation; NAVIGATORS INSURANCE
COMPANY, a New York corporation;
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a
California corporation; CERTAIN
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON,
a Kentucky corporation; PRAETORIAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania;
and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive.

12

Defendants.

13
14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16
17

On June 28, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company stipulated to

18

extend Defendant’s time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc.

19

95.) The Stipulation of the parties is APPROVED. Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company

20

shall have up to an including July 17, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s

21

Complaint.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

July 3, 2013

_

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE