Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Old Republic Insurance Company, et al

Filing 99

ORDER Re: 95 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 7/3/2013. (Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company shall have up to an including 7/17/2013, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ) a Pennsylvania corporation; EVEREST ) INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a ) Delaware corporation; INTERSTATE FIRE & ) CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois ) corporation; FINANCIAL PACIFIC ) INSURANCE COMPANY, a California ) corporation; ARCH SPECIALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska ) corporation; NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York ) corporation; CLARENDON NATIONAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey ) corporation; ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE ) COMPANY fka ALLIED INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; ) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a ) Pennsylvania corporation; ASPEN ) SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a ) North Dakota corporation; FIRST ) SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, ) a Missouri corporation; IRONSHORE ) SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) Arizona corporation; AMERICAN SAFETY ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oklahoma ) corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; ) PROBUILDERS SPECIALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, RRG, a Washington, D.C. ) TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation; Case No. 1:13-cv-00576-LJO-BAM The Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (Doc. 95) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 corporation; SECURITY AMERICA RISK RETENTION GROUP, a Vermont corporation; ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a New York corporation; CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY fka AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation; TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a California corporation; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON, a Kentucky corporation; PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive. 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 On June 28, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company stipulated to 18 extend Defendant’s time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. 19 95.) The Stipulation of the parties is APPROVED. Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Company 20 shall have up to an including July 17, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s 21 Complaint. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 3, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?