Thompson v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
Filing
8
Plaintiff's Request to Briefly Continue the Scheduling Conference and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/30/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/25/2013 is CONTINUED to 8/5/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin.(Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
FRANK N. DARRAS #128904, Frank@DarrasLaw.com
LISSA A. MARTINEZ #206994, LMartinez@DarrasLaw.com
SUSAN B. GRABARSKY #203004, SGrabarsky@DarrasLaw.com
PHILLIP S. BATHER #273236, PBather@DarrasLaw.com
DARRASLAW
3257 East Guasti Road, Suite 300
Ontario, California 91761-1227
Telephone: (909) 390-3770
Facsimile: (909) 974-2121
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
STACIA THOMPSON,
13
14
Case No: 1:13-cv-00589-AWI-GSA
[HONORABLE GARY S. AUSTIN]
Plaintiff,
vs.
15
16
17
18
19
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY; and,
G.C.I. AND NAMED
SUBSIDIARIES GROUP
DISABILITY INCOME
INSURANCE PLAN,
20
21
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
BRIEFLY CONTINUE THE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
AND ORDER
Date:
Time:
Place:
July 25, 2013
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom 10
Date Action Filed: April 23, 2013
Defendants.
22
23
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND
24
THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD:
25
Plaintiff Stacia Thompson (“Thompson” or “Plaintiff”), by and through her
26
attorneys of record, hereby respectfully request to briefly continue the Scheduling
27
Conference currently set for July 25, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
28
Good cause exists to grant Plaintiff’s request to briefly continue the
-1PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO BRIEFLY CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
AND ORDER
1
mandatory scheduling conference, based on the following:
1.
2
On April 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed her complaint seeking recovery of
3
long-term disability benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan governed by
4
ERISA.
5
2.
6
On April 24, 2013, the Court issued an order setting a mandatory
scheduling conference for July 25, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
7
3.
The complaint has not yet been served upon defendants.
8
4.
Lead counsel for Plaintiff has scheduled a pre-paid and pre-planned
9
family vacation from July 19, 2013 to July 29, 2013.
5.
10
On April 29, 2013, Plaintiff’s counsel’s office contacted the clerk to
11
Magistrate Judge Austin and obtained the following available dates to reset the
12
mandatory scheduling conference: August 5, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. or August 7, 2013,
13
at either 9:30 a.m. or 10:00 a.m.
14
Plaintiff respectfully requests that the mandatory scheduling conference
15
currently set for July 25, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to August 5, 2013, at 9:30
16
a.m.
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: April 29, 2013
DARRASLAW
/s/ Lissa A. Martinez
FRANK N. DARRAS
LISSA A. MARTINEZ
SUSAN B. GRABARSKY
PHILLIP S. BATHER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO BRIEFLY CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
AND ORDER
1
ORDER
2
Plaintiff’s request for a continuance of the mandatory scheduling conference
3
is GRANTED. The initial scheduling conference currently set for July 25, 2013, at
4
5
6
9:00 a.m. is continued to August 5, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall submit a
joint scheduling report one week prior to the hearing.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO BRIEFLY CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
AND ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 30, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?