Dury v. Ciufo

Filing 21

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Collect Filing Fee or Forfeit Future Collections signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/02/2020. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
CIUFO,

14

Case No. 1:13-cv-00595-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COLLECT FILING FEE OR FORFEIT
FUTURE COLLECTIONS
(ECF No. 20)

Defendant.

15
16

Plaintiff Matthew James Dury (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner who proceeded pro se and

17

in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

18

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

19

On July 30, 2014, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that this action

20

be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted.

21

(ECF No. 17.) On September 5, 2014, the assigned District Judge issued an order adopting the

22

findings and recommendations in full and dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon

23

which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 18.) Judgment was entered accordingly the same date.

24

(ECF No. 19.)

25

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Notice to Court,” filed March 2, 2020. (ECF No.

26

20.) In this notice, Plaintiff states that he has filed 15 cases, including the instant closed case,

27

with this Court for a total of $5,250 in court fees. Plaintiff states that he currently has $25.36 on

28

his trust account, yet Trust Fund Officer Bell and Warden True refuse to pay this court ordered
1

1

debt. Plaintiff states that the Court has 60 calendar days, or until April 20, 2020, to collect the

2

$25.36 from his account or forfeit all future collections of the $5,250 court fees. Based on

3

attachments to Plaintiff’s notice, it appears that the account balance of $25.36 is encumbered

4

towards debts he has agreed to pay, though which debts are not specified, and this encumbered

5

balance is preventing Plaintiff from being placed on indigent status. Another attachment to the

6

filing appears to be Plaintiff’s request for some type of intervention into a recent ruling in a prior

7

or ongoing criminal case. (Id.)

8

Though filed as a “notice,” the Court construes this filing as a motion requesting that the

9

Court immediately collect the encumbered balance from Plaintiff’s trust account, as well as

10

review the recent ruling in Plaintiff’s criminal matter. Both requests are denied for lack of

11

jurisdiction.

12

With respect to Plaintiff’s trust account balance, Plaintiff is reminded that the Court

13

collects fees based on Plaintiff’s monthly income or deposits to his trust account. Therefore, it is

14

unclear whether the referenced encumbrance is even related to the Court’s filing fees. To the

15

extent Plaintiff is requesting that the Court order prison officials to release the encumbered funds

16

to pay for Plaintiff’s filing fees, the Court has no jurisdiction to issue such an order. A remedy

17

may lie with the prison’s administrative grievance process, which it appears Plaintiff has already

18

begun to pursue.

19

As to Plaintiff’s request regarding his ongoing criminal case, the Court also lacks

20

jurisdiction to review orders issued in ongoing or prior criminal actions. Plaintiff should direct

21

any disagreement with an order entered in that criminal case to the court which issued the order.

22
23

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion, (ECF No. 20), is HEREBY DENIED. This action
remains closed.

24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

March 2, 2020

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
2