Klein v. Conanan
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING 41 Request for Subpoenas signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/29/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL KLEIN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
1:13-cv-00600-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
SUBPOENAS
(Doc. 41.)
DR. CONANAN,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael Klein (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This case now proceeds on the original
Complaint filed by Plaintiff on April 25, 2013, against defendant Dr. Conanan for failure to
provide adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 1.)
On October 8, 2014, the court issued a Scheduling Order setting out pretrial deadlines in
this action, including a deadline of June 8, 2015, for the completion of discovery, including the
filing of motions to compel. (Doc. 28.) Thus, this case is now in the discovery phase.
On January 28, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for ten certified subpoenas, to be served
on medical staff for possible statements from staff witnesses. (Doc. 41.) The court construes
this as a request for the issuance of subpoenas compelling witnesses to appear at trial.
Plaintiff’s request is premature, because trial has not been scheduled for this action. Therefore,
1
1
Plaintiff’s request shall be denied. When trial is scheduled, Plaintiff shall be provided with
2
instructions for requesting the appearance of witnesses.
3
4
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff=s request for
subpoenas, filed on January 28, 2015, is DENIED.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 29, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?