Moore v. Beal Properties, Inc. et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER for DISMISSAL of Action signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/13: This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD MOORE,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
BEAL PROPERTIES, INC., a California
corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:13-cv-00607-SAB
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
) DISMISSAL OF ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant
2
Beal Properties, Inc., a California corporation, and Navjeet Singh Chahal, the parties to this
3
action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each
5
party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
Dated: November 26, 2013
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
7
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
8
9
10
11
12
Dated: November 26, 2013
WILD, CARTER & TIPTON
13
/s/ Patrick J. Gorman
Patrick J. Gorman
Attorney for Defendants
Beal Properties, Inc., a California corporation
and Navjeet Singh Chahal
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
22
23
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
December 2, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?