Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Rabobank, et al.

Filing 28

ORDER to Adopt 26 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/27/13. 8 Motion to Intervene Terminated. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF CHUKCHANSI INDIANS, Plaintiff, 10 CASE NO. CV F 13-0609 LJO MJS ORDER TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Docs. 8, 27.) 11 12 13 vs. BABOBANK, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ______________________________/ 17 U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng issued June 11, 2013 findings and 18 recommendations ("f and r's") (doc. 26) to permit parties identified as the "Lewis Faction" to 19 intervene in this action and to respond to the complaint of plaintiff parties identified as the 20 "Ayala Faction." In response to the f and r's, the Ayala Faction filed June 26, 2013 objections 21 (doc. 27), which fail to address meaningfully the f and r's analysis of intervention factors. 22 Instead, the objections focus chiefly on extraneous matters and the overall merits of the parties' 23 dispute. 24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court carefully considered the objections 25 and carefully reviewed de novo the record and f and r’s. This Court finds that the f and r’s 26 properly considered and applied the record to recommend the Lewis' Faction's intervention to 27 fulfill intervention purposes and that the f and r's are supported by the record and proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, this Court: 2 1. ADOPTS in full the June 11, 2013 f and r's (doc. 26); 3 2. ORDERS the Lewis Faction, no later than July 15, 2013, to file and serve 4 papers to respond to the Ayala Faction's complaint; and 3. 5 DIRECTS the clerk to term doc. 8. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 27, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?