Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Rabobank, et al.
Filing
28
ORDER to Adopt 26 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/27/13. 8 Motion to Intervene Terminated. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA
OF CHUKCHANSI INDIANS,
Plaintiff,
10
CASE NO. CV F 13-0609 LJO MJS
ORDER TO ADOPT FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Docs. 8, 27.)
11
12
13
vs.
BABOBANK, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
______________________________/
17
U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng issued June 11, 2013 findings and
18
recommendations ("f and r's") (doc. 26) to permit parties identified as the "Lewis Faction" to
19
intervene in this action and to respond to the complaint of plaintiff parties identified as the
20
"Ayala Faction." In response to the f and r's, the Ayala Faction filed June 26, 2013 objections
21
(doc. 27), which fail to address meaningfully the f and r's analysis of intervention factors.
22
Instead, the objections focus chiefly on extraneous matters and the overall merits of the parties'
23
dispute.
24
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court carefully considered the objections
25
and carefully reviewed de novo the record and f and r’s. This Court finds that the f and r’s
26
properly considered and applied the record to recommend the Lewis' Faction's intervention to
27
fulfill intervention purposes and that the f and r's are supported by the record and proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, this Court:
2
1.
ADOPTS in full the June 11, 2013 f and r's (doc. 26);
3
2.
ORDERS the Lewis Faction, no later than July 15, 2013, to file and serve
4
papers to respond to the Ayala Faction's complaint; and
3.
5
DIRECTS the clerk to term doc. 8.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
June 27, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
66h44d
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?