Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Rabobank, et al.
Filing
38
ORDER TO CONFIRM DISMISSAL re 37 Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/19/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA
OF CHUKCHANSI INDIANS,
CASE NO. CV F 13-0609 LJO MJS
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER TO CONFIRM DISMISSAL
(Doc. 37)
9
vs.
10
11
12
RABOBANK, et al.,
13
Defendants.
______________________________/
14
This Court issued its July 19, 2013 order to dismiss this action without prejudice under
15
16
the mistaken impression that no party had filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint.
17
F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(i).
18
Rabobank had filed an answer to require a stipulation. See F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Court staff
19
conferred with Rabobank's counsel to confirm that Rabobank agrees to dismissal of this action
20
pursuant to plaintiff's notice of dismissal and this Court's order. As such, this Court confirms
21
dismissal of this action without prejudice despite the absence of Rabobank's stipulation under
22
F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii).
After issuance of the order, this Court confirmed that defendant
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
See
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
July 19, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
1
1
66h44d
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?