Moore v. King of Central Valley et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and to Reschedule Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/30/2013. (Initial Scheduling Conference previously set for 8/13/2013, has been CONTINUED to 9/24/2013, at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiffs complaint is hereby extended to August 30, 2013.)(Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. TANYA E. MOORE, SBN 206683 2 tanya@moorelawfirm.com 332 North Second Street 3 San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 4 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff RONALD MOORE 6 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 7 KURT A. FRANKLIN, SBN 172715 MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON, SBN 256654 8 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 9 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 10 Attorneys for Defendants King of Central 11 Valley and Central Valley Group, Inc. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 RONALD MOORE, CASE NO. 13-CV-00611-AWI-BAM 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO RESCHEDULE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 18 Plaintiff, v. 19 KING OF CENTRAL VALLEY, a California General Partnership; CENTRAL VALLEY 20 GROUP, INC., a California corporation, dba BURGER KING #7705;, 21 Defendants. 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants King 24 of Central Valley and Central Valley Group, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, 25 hereby stipulate as follows: 26 27 WHEREAS, Defendants waived service on May 28, 2013; 28 5244405.1 WHEREAS, this action was filed on April 26, 2013; WHEREAS, Defendants' answer to the Complaint is currently due on July 19, STIP AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO -1- RESPOND TO COMPLT AND RESCHEDULE SCHED CONF 1 2013; 2 WHEREAS, the Court's Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for 3 August 13, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.; 4 WHEREAS, the parties are in the process of negotiating a settlement of this action 5 and, therefore, have agreed to extend Defendants' time to respond to the complaint to 6 August 30, 2013; 7 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, 8 through their counsel, as follows: 9 1) Defendants shall have to and including August 30, 2013 to answer or 10 otherwise respond to the complaint; and 11 2) In the interest of judicial economy and efficient use of resources, the parties 12 hereby request that the Court reschedule the Mandatory Scheduling Conference to a 13 date after September 1, 2013 that is convenient for the Court’s calendar. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: July 30, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 16 17 By: 18 /S/ Tanya E. Moore (as authorized on July 18, 2013) TANYA E. MOORE Attorneys for Plaintiff RONALD MOORE 19 20 DATED: July 30, 2013 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 21 22 23 24 25 / / / By: /S/ Megan Oliver Thompson KURT A. FRANKLIN MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON Attorneys for Defendants KING OF CENTRAL VALLEY and CENTRAL VALLEY GROUP, INC. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 5244405.1 -2- STIP AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLT AND RESCHEDULE SCHED CONF 1 2 ORDER Based on the above Stipulation, and for good cause shown, Defendants' deadline 3 to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby extended to August 30, 2013. Further, the 4 Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for August 13, 2013 is continued to 5 September 24, 2013. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: /s/ Barbara July 30, 2013 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5244405.1 -3- STIP AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLT AND RESCHEDULE SCHED CONF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?