Morales v. Constance et al

Filing 25

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/16/2014. (Dismissal Deadline set for 2/21/2014).(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

JOHN MORALES,
Plaintiff,
vs.

CASE NO. CV F 13-0651 LJO MJS
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 24.)

16
17
18

MARILYN J. CONSTANCE,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff's counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties.
Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than February
21, 2014, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show
good cause why the action has not been dismissed.
This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the January 22, 2014
scheduling conference, which is subject to immediate resetting.
Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on
counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. This

28
1

1

Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil

2

Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court

3

deems appropriate.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 16, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2