Hodges v. Sharon, et al.

Filing 14

SECOND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/15/2014 directing Plaintiff to submit complete number of copies of Complaint for service of process on Defendants re 12 , 13 . (Filing Deadline: 5/19/2014).(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRE’ID O.I. HODGES, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 JERALD SHARON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00654-SAB (PC) SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT COMPLETE NUMBER OF COPIES OF COMPLAINT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS [ECF Nos. 12, 13] Plaintiff Tyre’Id O.I. Hodges is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On March 25, 2014, the Court found that service of the original complaint was appropriate 20 based on Plaintiff’s intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable by the Court. The Court 21 sent Plaintiff the necessary service of process documents for completion and return to Court. On April 22 7, 2014, the Court received nine completed copies of the summonses and USM-285 forms, however, 23 Plaintiff only returned one copy of the complaint, instead of the necessary ten copies of the complaint. 24 Without the necessary number of copies of the complaint, the Court cannot proceed with service of 25 process by the U.S. Marshal. Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this 26 27 28 1 1 order, Plaintiff shall submit an additional nine copies of the complaint. Failure to comply with this 2 order may result in the action being dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 15, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?