Moore v. Hinds Investments, L.P. a California Limited Partnership, et al.

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Waive Financial Factors of Defendant's Tenth and Seventeenth Affirmative Defenses, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/4/2014. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations GREGORY F. HURLEY, Cal. Bar No. 126791 3 ALANA R. CHIMES, Cal. Bar No. 254730 650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor 4 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993 Telephone: 714.513.5100 5 Facsimile: 714.513.5130 2 6 Attorneys for Defendant HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:13-cv-00665-AWI-BAM v. 14 HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P. a California Limited Partnership; C & Z, 15 INC., dba TANG DYNASTY, Defendant. 16 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WAIVE FINANCIAL FACTORS OF DEFENDANT’S TENTH AND SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii Complaint Filed: May 7, 2013 Trial Date: March 3, 2015 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:423905625.1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WAIVE FINANCIAL FACTORS 1 Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Waive Financial Resources Factors 2 of Defendant’s Tenth and Seventeenth Affirmative Defenses submitted by 3 Defendants HINDS INVESTMENTS L.P. and Plaintiff RONALD MOORE, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 Defendant shall not raise or put on any evidence in support of a motion, at a 6 hearing, or at trial to support the “financial resources” or “cost of removal” factors 7 of Defendant’s Tenth Affirmative Defense or Defendant’s Seventeenth Affirmative 8 defense. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: /s/ Barbara June 4, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1SMRH:423905625.1 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WAIVE FINANCIAL FACTORS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?