Moore v. Hinds Investments, L.P. a California Limited Partnership, et al.
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING ACTION signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 07/09/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD MOORE,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P., a California
Limited Partnership, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:13-cv-00665-AWI-BAM
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant
2
Hinds Investments, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, the parties who have appeared in this
3
action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, including
5
as to Defendant C & Z, Inc., dba Tang Dynasty, whose default was previously entered (Dkt.
6
34).
7
8
Date: July 9, 2014
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
9
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
10
11
12
13
Date: July 9, 2014
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
14
15
/s/ Alana R. Chimes
Gregory F. Hurley
Alana R. Chimes
Attorneys for Defendant
Hinds Investments, L.P., a California Limited
Partnership
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
The parties having so stipulated,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety,
23
including as to Defendant C & Z, Inc., dba Tang Dynasty, whose default was previously
24
entered.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
July 9, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?