Henley v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/21/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ROBERT HENLEY, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. CV F 13-0684 LJO SAB ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 22.) 16 17 18 LOWE'S HIW, INC., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 The parties' counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than April 4, 2014, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. No good cause is apparent to warrant more than 45 days to complete settlement and dismiss this action. This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the March 5, 2014 summary judgment hearing, the August 20, 2014 pretrial conference and October 7, 2014 trial, which are subject to immediate resetting before this district judge or any other available 28 1 1 district judge, including a district judge sitting in Sacramento or another district. 2 Failure to comply with this order will be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on 3 counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. This 4 Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of Civil 5 Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court 6 deems appropriate. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill February 21, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?