Moore v. Gulamali et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal of Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/21/14. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD MOORE,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
AMIN GULAMALI, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:13-cv-00686-SAB
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
) DISMISSAL OF ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants
2
Amin Gulamali; Nilofer Kabani; Ramzan Gulamali; Irene Gulamali; Dalbir Singh Behla dba
3
Kwik Korner; Jasbinder Singh aka Jasbir Singh dba Kwik Korner; and Swinder Singh dba
4
Kwik Korner, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to
5
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with
6
prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
7
8
Date: April 21, 2014
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
9
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
10
11
12
13
Date: April 21, 2014
JAMES M. MAKASIAN, APC
14
/s/ James M. Makasian
James M. Makasian
Attorneys for Defendants
Amin Gulamali; Nilofer Kabani; Ramzan
Gulamali; Irene Gulamali; Dalbir Singh Behla dba
Kwik Korner; Jasbinder Singh aka Jasbir Singh dba
Kwik Korner; and Swinder Singh dba Kwik Korner
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER
21
22
The parties having so stipulated,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
24
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 21, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?