Koenig v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filing
19
ORDER PERMITTING Filing of Surreply 18 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/22/13. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
PHILIP KOENIG,
9
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-0693 AWI BAM
Plaintiff
10
v.
11
ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF
SURREPLY
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Doc. 18
12
Defendant
13
Plaintiff Philip Koenig is proceeding in this case pro se. Defendant Bank of America has
14
15
filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff filed an opposition, objecting to consideration of documents
16
for which Defendant sought judicial notice. Defendant filed a reply. Plaintiff now seeks leave to
17
file a surreply to address case law cited by Defendant in the reply; Plaintiff has attached the
18
proposed surreply as exhibit A to Doc. 18. As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and his briefing may
19
be helpful in resolving this motion, Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED; the surreply is deemed to be
20
filed.
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 22, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
25
26
27
28
0m8i788
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?