Buck v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/14/2013 vacating hearing re 8 Motion to Dismiss with the filing of Remand Motion. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 TRISHA BUCK, 14 CASE NO. CV F 13-0701 LJO GSA Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 vs. ORDER TO VACATE HEARING WITH FILING OF REMAND MOTION (Docs. 8, 14) CEMEX, INC/, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ 20 On May 20, 2013, defendants filed their F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 21 complaint (doc. 8) and set a June 25, 2013 hearing. On June 13, 2013, plaintiff's counsel 22 advised this Court that he had not received defendants' motion to dismiss papers. Also on June 23 13, 2013, plaintiff filed her motion to remand (doc. 13), and the parties filed their stipulation to 24 continue the June 25, 2013 hearing to July 2, 2013 (doc. 14). This Court does not rule on 25 motions to dismiss until its jurisdiction and remand issues are settled. In addition, this Court's 26 practice is to decide motions on the record without a hearing. As such, this Court: 27 28 1. VACATES the June 25, 2013 hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss and ORDERS the parties not to appear on June 25, 2013; 1 1 2. ORDERS defendants, no later than 20 days after issuance of a remand order, to 2 file and serve papers to respond to plaintiffs' complaint, unless this action is remanded to state 3 court. Such response may include a renewed motion to dismiss; and 4 3. 5 This Court will take no further action on defendants' F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss 6 DIRECTS the clerk to term the F.R.Civ.P. 12 motion to dismiss (doc. 8). until a remand order is issued and a renewed motion to dismiss is properly set before this Court. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 14, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?