Buck v. Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC et al
Filing
57
ORDER OF JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF, TRISHA BUCK signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/5/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
DOROTHY S. LIU, SBN 196369
2 dliu@hansonbridgett.com
DAVID A. ABELLA, SBN 275982
3 dabella@hansonbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
4 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 777-3200
5 Facsimile:
(415) 541-9366
6 Attorneys for Defendants CEMEX, INC. and
CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
7 PACIFIC, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
TRISHA BUCK, on behalf of herself, and all
12 others similarly situated,
CASE NO. 13-cv-00701-LJO-MJS
[CLASS ACTION]
13
14
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF JUDGMENT AGAINST
PLAINTIFF TRISHA BUCK
v.
15 CEMEX, INC., a Louisiana Corporation;
CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
16 PACIFIC, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
The Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10584786.1
-1ORDER OF JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF TRISHA BUCK
1
This action came before the Court pursuant to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the
2 Pleadings and Motion to Strike (ECF Docket Nos. 45, 46). The issues have been briefed by both
3 parties and a decision has been rendered.
4
WHEREAS, this Court GRANTED Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
5 (ECF Docket No. 55);
6
WHEREAS, this Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the
7 Pleadings (ECF Docket No. 55) ordered Plaintiff to file a written statement certifying that she
8 exhausted the collective bargaining agreement's grievance procedure no later than October 25,
9 2014; and,
10
WHEREAS, this Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the
11 Pleadings (ECF Docket No. 55) stated that Plaintiff's request for leave to amend her complaint
12 would be DENIED on the basis of futility if Plaintiff failed to file the written statement certifying
13 that she exhausted the grievance procedure by October 25, 2014; and,
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiff failed to file a written statement certifying that she exhausted the
15 grievance procedure, as ordered by the Court; therefore,
16
Pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
17 (ECF Docket No. 55), IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Trisha Buck take
18 nothing, that all claims brought by Plaintiff be dismissed, that Judgment is entered against Plaintiff
19 in accordance with the Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed on
20 October 24, 2014 (ECF Docket No. 55), that Defendants recover their costs as to Plaintiff; and that
21 the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
November 5, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
10584786.1
-2ORDER OF JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF TRISHA BUCK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?