Farm Credit West v. Lanting

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 12/20/2013 for receipt of plaintiff's responsive pleading to defendants' second amended answer and second amended counterclaim. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/16/2013. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

René Lastreto II, #100993
[e-mail]
Scott J. Ivy, #197681
[e-mail]
Michael J. Gomez, #251571
[e-mail]
Lang, Richert & Patch
Post Office Box 40012
Fresno, California 93755-0012
[phone] Phone / [phone] Fax

M:\35074\Pleadings\Motion to Dismiss\Order on Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading.wpd:cam

Attorneys for Plaintiff, FARM CREDIT WEST, PCA

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

10
11

FARM CREDIT WEST, PCA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

Case No. 1:13-CV-00712-AWI-SMS
ORDER ON STIPULATION
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO
DEFENDANTS CASE AND JANE
LANTING’S SECOND AMENDED
ANSWER AND SECOND AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIM

v.
CASE LANTING, an individual; and, JANE
LANTING, an individual

16

Defendants.

[No Hearing Required]

17
18

The Court having read and considered the “Stipulation Extending Plaintiff’s Time to File a

19

Responsive Pleading to Defendants Case and Jane Lanting’s Second Amended Answer and

20

Second Amended Counterclaim” between Plaintiff Farm Credit West, PCA (“Plaintiff”), on the

21

one hand, and Defendants Case Lanting and Jane Lanting (the “Defendants”), on the other hand

22

(the “Stipulation”), hereby

23

ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES:

24

1.

The Stipulation is approved.

25

2.

Plaintiff shall have through and including December 20, 2013, to file a

26

responsive pleading to the Defendants’ Second Amended Answer and Second Amended

27

Counterclaim.

28
Order on Stip to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading

-1-

1

3.

The deadline to exchange the Initial Disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) of the

2

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be forty-five (45) days either (i) from the filing of

3

Plaintiff’s Answer to the Second Amended Answer and Second Amended Counterclaim, or (ii)

4

from the entry of an order of the Court ruling on Plaintiff’s motion challenging the sufficiency

5

of the Second Amended Answer and Second Amended Counterclaim.

6

4.

In all other respects, the Scheduling Order will remain unchanged.

7
8

ORDER

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated:

October 16, 2013

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

icido34h

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order on Stip to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading

-2-