Whitfield v. Hernandez et al
Filing
38
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/2/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 6/13/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 8/15/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 1/12/2015; Expert 3/23/2015. Mid-Discovery Status Conferen ce set for 9/10/2014 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/30/2015; Hearing by 4/27/2015. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/30/2015 ; Hearing by 6/1/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 8/19/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Jury Trial set for 10/20/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
STEVEN WHITFIELD,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
JOHN HERNANDEZ, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:13-CV-00724 AWI JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 8/15/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Non-Expert: 1/12/2015
Expert: 3/23/2015
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
9/10/2014 at 9:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/30/2015
Hearing: 4/27/2015
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/30/2015
Hearing: 6/1/2015
20
21
23
Pre-Trial Conference:
8/19/2015 at 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 2
24
Trial:
22
25
26
27
28
I.
Date of Scheduling Conference
May 30, 2014.
1
10/20/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2
Jury trial: 2-7 days
1
II.
Appearances of Counsel
2
Plaintiff appeared in propria persona.
3
Timothy Delgado on behalf of Defendants.
4
5
III.
Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division
6
of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire
7
nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely
8
manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as
9
expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may
10
find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any
11
criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial
12
even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these
13
circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All
14
parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding
15
will trail the completion of the criminal trial.
16
The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all
17
proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including
18
entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local
19
Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United States
20
District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is
21
taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. However, the parties are
22
hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to
23
consent.
24
Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing
25
United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant
26
to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
27
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
28
District of California.
2
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
1
2
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, the parties
3
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
4
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
5
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
6
7
motion to amend, no later than August 15, 2014.
8
V.
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
9
Because the parties report they have begun discovery, are confident that the information that
10
would be included in initial disclosures has been disclosed and ask to be relieved of the obligation to
11
provide initial disclosures, the parties are relieved of their duty to exchange the initial disclosures
12
required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). They are reminded of their obligations to supplement their
13
discovery as needed as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) and are reminded that their failure to disclose
14
information could result in the information being precluded from trial.
15
16
17
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
January 12, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before March 23, 2015.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before January 26,
18
2015, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before February 23, 2015. The written designation of
19
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
20
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
21
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
22
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
23
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
24
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
25
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
26
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
27
28
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
3
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for September 10, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. before the
1
2
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
3
California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all
4
counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall be e-
5
mailed, in Word format, to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the
6
discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to
7
completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
8
CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk
9
no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
10
VI.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
11
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
12
than March 30, 2015, and heard on or before April 27, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard at
13
9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United
14
States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California.
15
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
16
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
17
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
18
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
19
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
20
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
21
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
22
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
23
and dropped from calendar.
24
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
25
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
26
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
27
28
4
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
1
2
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
3
before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than March 30, 2015, and heard no later
4
5
than June 1, 2015, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States
6
District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and
7
Local Rules 230 and 260.
8
VII.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
9
Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication the parties
10
are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the
11
motion at least 21 days before the filing of the motion.
12
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
13
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
14
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
15
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
16
expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.
17
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the joint statement of
18
undisputed facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a
19
joint statement of undisputed facts.
20
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as
21
ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
22
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
23
August 19, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.
24
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
25
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
26
directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at AWIOrders@caed.uscourts.gov.
27
28
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
5
1
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
2
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
3
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
4
IX.
October 20, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United
5
6
Trial Date
States District Court Judge.
7
A.
This is a jury trial.
8
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 2-7 days.
9
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
10
California, Rule 285.
11
X.
Settlement Conference
12
The parties do not request a settlement conference be set at this time. If, in the future, the
13
parties agree that the case is in a settlement posture, they may file a joint request that a settlement
14
conference be scheduled.
15
XI.
Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
16
Techniques to Shorten Trial
17
Not applicable at this time.
18
19
20
21
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
22
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
23
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
24
handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as
25
provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern
26
District of California.
27
XIV. Effect of this Order
28
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
6
1
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
2
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
3
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
4
subsequent status conference.
5
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
6
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
7
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
8
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
9
for granting the relief requested.
10
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 2, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?