Thebeau v. Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District et al

Filing 17

ORDER After Informal Conference on Discovery Dispute, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/22/2014. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEBBIE THEBEAU, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT., et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00730 LJO JLT ORDER AFTER INFORMAL CONFERENCE ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE (Doc. 15) At the request of counsel, on May 22, 2014, the Court held an informal conference regarding 18 counsels’ disagreement over certain discovery requests. Counsel were able to resolve most of the 19 issues and, therefore, the Court ORDERS: 20 1. Requests Nos. 5 & 7 to Defendant Burgess– The parties will exchange a stipulation 21 authenticating the documents related to the Warrack litigation. However, because this does not 22 resolve the dispute in its entirety, Plaintiff is authorized to file her motion to compel as set forth in 23 Local Rule 251(a), (c); 24 25 26 2. Requests Nos. 10-12, 15-17, 24-26 to TVHD – TVHD will provide a supplemental response indicating that it has no responsive documents; 3. Requests Nos. 13-14 to TVHD – With the clarification that these requests relate to 27 Plaintiffs written statement presented to the TVHD Board related to the March 1, 2010 incident, 28 Plaintiff is authorized to file her motion to compel as set forth in Local Rule 251(a), (c); 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 4. Request No. 29 to TVHD – TVHD will supplement its response to produce additional documents; 5. Defendants are authorized to file their motion to compel the production of documents to Verizon California, Inc; 6. The nondispositive motion filing deadline is extended to May 30, 2014 with the hearing to be held no later than June 27, 2014. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 22, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?