Thebeau v. Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION TO DISMISS with Prejudice; ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/18/2014. Alan Burgess terminated.(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
(WESTERN DIVISION)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DEBBIE THEBEAU, an individual,
Case No. 1:13-cv-00730-LJO-JLT
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE; ORDER
vs.
TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTHCARE
DISTRICT, a governmental entity, ALAN
BURGESS, an individual, and DOES 1
through 25, inclusive,
[FRCP 41; L.R. 143]
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff Debbie Thebeau, and defendants Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District
and Alan Burgess, who comprise all the parties who have appeared in this action,
stipulate and agree that:
(1)
defendant Alan Burgess, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
23
24
25
26
The above-captioned action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to
(2)
The second and third causes of action stated in the complaint in the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP
41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and,
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
1:13-CV-00730-LJO-JLT
1
(3)
The parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs in connection with
2
the action against defendant Alan Burgess and as to the second and third
3
causes of action.
4
5
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:
6
7
DATED: June 18, 2014
COLE PEDROZA LLP
8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
DATED: June 18, 2014
s/Matthew S. Levinson
Attorneys for Defendants
TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTHCARE
DISTRICT and
ALAN BURGESS
REHWALD GLASNER & CHALEFF
14
15
By: s/William Rehwald
(as authorized on June 18, 2014 (LR 131(e))
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEBBIE THEBEAU
16
17
18
19
20
21
SO ORDERED
Dated: June 18, 2014
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
1:13-CV-00730-LJO-JLT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?