Thebeau v. Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION TO DISMISS with Prejudice; ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/18/2014. Alan Burgess terminated.(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 (WESTERN DIVISION) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DEBBIE THEBEAU, an individual, Case No. 1:13-cv-00730-LJO-JLT Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER vs. TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, a governmental entity, ALAN BURGESS, an individual, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, [FRCP 41; L.R. 143] Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff Debbie Thebeau, and defendants Tehachapi Valley Healthcare District and Alan Burgess, who comprise all the parties who have appeared in this action, stipulate and agree that: (1) defendant Alan Burgess, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 23 24 25 26 The above-captioned action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to (2) The second and third causes of action stated in the complaint in the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and, 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 1:13-CV-00730-LJO-JLT 1 (3) The parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs in connection with 2 the action against defendant Alan Burgess and as to the second and third 3 causes of action. 4 5 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: 6 7 DATED: June 18, 2014 COLE PEDROZA LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 13 DATED: June 18, 2014 s/Matthew S. Levinson Attorneys for Defendants TEHACHAPI VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT and ALAN BURGESS REHWALD GLASNER & CHALEFF 14 15 By: s/William Rehwald (as authorized on June 18, 2014 (LR 131(e)) Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBBIE THEBEAU 16 17 18 19 20 21 SO ORDERED Dated: June 18, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 1:13-CV-00730-LJO-JLT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?