Centre for Neuro Skills v. Blue Cross of California et al

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 GLENN E. SOLOMON (State Bar No. 155674) PETER J. BRACHMAN (State Bar No. 248805) 2 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C. 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1600 3 Los Angeles, California 90067-2517 Telephone: (310) 551-8157 4 Facsimile: (310) 551-8181 email: pbrachman@health-law.com 5 Attorneys for CENTRE FOR NEURO 6 SKILLS 7 TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C. 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAKERSFIELD DIVISION 11 12 CENTRE FOR NEURO SKILLS, Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA DBA ANTHEM BLUE CROSS; 16 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND 17 HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY; HEALTHCOMP; SANTA ROSA 18 RANCHERIA TACHI PALACE HOTEL & CASINO AND SANTA 19 ROSA RANCHERIA TACHI PALACE HOTEL & CASINO TRIBAL 20 MEMBER HEALTH CARE PLAN; 21 and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive Defendants. 22 CASE NO. 1:13-00743-LJO-JLT Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neil ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 23 24 25 26 27 28 1153926.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 All causes of action are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all parties in 3 this action. The clerk is directed to close this action. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 3, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1153926.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?