Centre for Neuro Skills v. Blue Cross of California et al
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1 GLENN E. SOLOMON (State Bar No. 155674)
PETER J. BRACHMAN (State Bar No. 248805)
2 HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C.
1875 Century Park East, Suite 1600
3 Los Angeles, California 90067-2517
Telephone: (310) 551-8157
4 Facsimile: (310) 551-8181
email: pbrachman@health-law.com
5
Attorneys for CENTRE FOR NEURO
6 SKILLS
7
TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181
1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C.
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BAKERSFIELD DIVISION
11
12 CENTRE FOR NEURO SKILLS,
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA
DBA ANTHEM BLUE CROSS;
16 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND
17 HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY;
HEALTHCOMP; SANTA ROSA
18 RANCHERIA TACHI PALACE
HOTEL & CASINO AND SANTA
19 ROSA RANCHERIA TACHI PALACE
HOTEL & CASINO TRIBAL
20 MEMBER HEALTH CARE PLAN;
21 and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Defendants.
22
CASE NO. 1:13-00743-LJO-JLT
Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neil
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO RULE
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
23
24
25
26
27
28
1153926.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
1
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
2
All causes of action are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all parties in
3 this action. The clerk is directed to close this action.
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
February 3, 2014
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
TEL: (310) 551-8111 • FAX: (310) 551-8181
1875 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 1600
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-2517
HOOPER, LUNDY & BOOKMAN, P.C.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1153926.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?