Martin v. Fernandez et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION For Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) ORDER, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/24/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711 Supervising Deputy Attorney General RUSSA M. BOYD, State Bar No. 239380 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 319-9476 Facsimile: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Russa.Boyd@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Fernandez 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO 11 12 13 Case No. 1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC) BRIAN MARTIN, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 14 v. 15 16 ANTHONY FERNANDEZ, ET AL., 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff Brian Martin and Defendant Fernandez have resolved this case in its entirety. 20 Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of 21 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 22 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 23 It is so stipulated. 24 25 26 Dated: June 13, 2014 /s/ Brian Martin (original signature on file) Plaintiff 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC)) 1 Dated: June 13, 2014 /s/ Russa M. Boyd (original signature on file) Russa M. Boyd Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General's Office Attorney for Defendant Fernandez 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: June 24, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?