Martin v. Fernandez et al
Filing
50
STIPULATION For Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) ORDER, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/24/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
RUSSA M. BOYD, State Bar No. 239380
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 319-9476
Facsimile: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Russa.Boyd@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Fernandez
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO
11
12
13
Case No. 1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC)
BRIAN MARTIN,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
14
v.
15
16
ANTHONY FERNANDEZ, ET AL.,
17
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff Brian Martin and Defendant Fernandez have resolved this case in its entirety.
20
Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of
21
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
22
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
23
It is so stipulated.
24
25
26
Dated:
June 13, 2014
/s/ Brian Martin (original signature on file)
Plaintiff
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC))
1
Dated:
June 13, 2014
/s/ Russa M. Boyd (original signature on file)
Russa M. Boyd
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
Attorney for Defendant Fernandez
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The
Clerk of the Court shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: June 24, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (1:13-CV-00754 JLT (PC))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?