E. & J. Gallo Winery
Filing
13
ORDER Referring Pending 11 MOTION to DISMISS or Transfer to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; ORDER Vacating September 9, 2013 Hearing Date, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/23/13. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California
corporation,
Plaintiff
13
v.
14
15
GRENADE BEVERAGE LLC, a
California limited liability company,
16
CASE NO. 1:13-CV-0770-AWI-SAB
ORDER REFERRING PENDING
MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A.
BOONE
ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 9,
2013 HEARING DATE
Defendant.
17
18
19
Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery has filed a complaint in which it alleges Defendant is
20
violating Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery’s trademark .
21
motion to dismiss or to transfer this action on the ground that the Eastern District of California is
22
an improper venue for this action. The motion to dismiss or transfer is currently set for oral
23
argument before the undersigned on September 9, 2013. The Court has reviewed the pending
24
motion, and the Court finds that the pending motion should be referred to Magistrate Judge
25
Stanley A. Boone for entry Findings and Recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and
26
Local Rule 72.
27
//
28
//
On July 22, 2013, Defendant filed a
1
2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
4
The pending motion to dismiss or transfer is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge
Stanley A. Boone;
5
2.
The September 9, 2013 hearing before the undersigned is VACATED; and
6
3.
The parties are hereby informed that Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone’
7
Chambers will set a new hearing date and/or a briefing schedule at Magistrate Judge Stanley A.
8
Boone’s convenience.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 23, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
13
14
0m8i788
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?