Condon v. People Of California

Filing 11

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-0673 JAM KJN) to Fresno (1:13-cv-0792 GSA) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/13. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE A. CONDON, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. 2:13-cv-0673 JAM KJN P vs. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel or “pro se,” has filed an 16 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a motion to stay and 17 abey this action, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In her application, 18 petitioner challenges a conviction by the Tuolumne County Superior Court. Tuolumne County is 19 part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 20 California. See Local Rule 120(d). 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 22 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 23 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 24 court. This court will not rule on the pending matters. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, or 3 her motion to stay and abey this action; 4 5 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 6 7 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 8 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 9 10 11 DATED: May 23, 2013 12 13 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 cond0673.109 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?