Condon v. People Of California
Filing
55
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/21/2015. Appointed counsel shall file a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days. cc: Federal Defender Habeas Appointment. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JULIE CONDON,
12
13
14
Case No. 1:13-cv-00792-GSA (HC)
Petitioner,
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
v.
A.W. Cox, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
19
On April 23, 2014, Petitioner filed her second amended petition for writ of habeas
20 corpus. (ECF No. 26). On April 30, 2014, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to appoint
21 counsel because it did not find that the interests of justice required the appointment of counsel at
22 that time.
(ECF No. 27).
Subsequently, Respondent filed an answer to the petition and
23 Petitioner filed a traverse. The Court now reviews whether to appoint counsel to Petitioner at
24 this time.
25
There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings.
26 See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d
27 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment
28 of counsel at any stage of the case if “the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Rules
1
1 Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court should only appoint counsel under “exceptional
2 circumstances” and after evaluating the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the
3 petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.
4 See Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). The decision to appoint counsel is
5 within the discretion of the district court. See Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir.
6 1986).
7
In the present case, the Court has reviewed the record and finds that the interests of
8 justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time due to Petitioner’s indigency
9 and given the complexity of the issues involved with respect to Petitioner’s third claim for relief
10 that her trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. Accordingly, in the interests of justice, the
11 Court grants Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. Pursuant to General Order No. 186
12 of the Eastern District of California, which is the amended Federal Defender Plan for the Eastern
13 District of California, the matter will be referred to the Federal Defender’s Office to find
14 Petitioner counsel. Counsel shall file a supplemental traverse regarding Petitioner’s third claim
15 for relief.
16
17
ORDER
18
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1. Petitioner is granted the appointment of counsel;
21
2. The matter is hereby referred to the Federal Public Defender’s Office to find counsel
22
23
24
for Petitioner;
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Federal
Defender Attention: Habeas Appointment;
25
4. Appointed counsel shall file a notice of appearance with this Court within twenty
26
(20) days of the date of service of this order and counsel shall contact the Clerk’s
27
Office to make arrangements for copies of any relevant documents;
28
5. Within forty-five (45) days from the date that counsel is appointed, Petitioner’s
2
1
counsel shall file a supplemental traverse with respect to Petitioner’s third claim for
2
relief; and
3
6. Respondent may file a reply to Petitioner’s supplemental traverse within thirty (30)
days of the date Petitioner’s supplemental traverse is filed.
4
5
6 All motions shall be submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless
7 otherwise ordered by the Court. Local Rule 230(l). Extensions of time will only be granted
8 upon a showing of good cause. All provisions of Local Rule 110 are applicable to this order.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 21, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?