Epperly v. County of Fresno
Filing
43
ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/5/15. Plaintiff's counsel's firm name changed to Messing Adam & Jamine LLP (Sant Agata, S)
1 Gary M. Messing, Bar No. 075363
James W. Henderson, Jr., Bar No. 071170
2 CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP
Attorneys at Law
3 980 9th Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, California 95814
4 Telephone:
916.446.5297
Facsimile:
916.448.5047
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL W. EPPERLY
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11 DANIEL W. EPPERLY,
Case No. 1:13-CV-00795-BAM
12
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION
OF ATTORNEY
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 COUNTY OF FRESNO,
15
Defendant.
16
17
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, subject to approval by the court, Plaintiff DANIEL
18 W. EPPERLY substitutes James W. Henderson, Jr., State Bar No. 071170, c/o Messing Adam &
19 Jasmine LLP as counsel for record in place of James W. Henderson, Jr., State Bar No. 071170, c/o
20 Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP. Contact information for new counsel is as follows:
21
Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP
22
980 9th Street, Suite 380
23
Sacramento, CA 95814
24
Telephone: (916) 446-5297 / Facsimile: (916) 448-5047
25
Email: jhenderson@majlabor.com
26
27
28
CARROLL, BURDICK &
MCDONOUGH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
Case No. 1:13-CV-00795-BAM
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1 I consent to the above substitution.
2
/s/ Daniel W. Epperly
3 Date:
Daniel W. Epperly
4
5 I consent to being substituted.
CARROLL, BURDICK & MCDONOUGH LLP
6
/s/ David Godwin
7 Date: 5/2/15
David Godwin
8
9 I consent to the above substitution.
MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP
10
/s/ James W. Henderson, Jr.
11 Date: 4/17/15
James W. Henderson, Jr.
12
13
14
ORDER
The substitution of attorney is hereby approved.
15
16 IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 Dated:
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CARROLL, BURDICK &
MCDONOUGH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
May 5, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?