Arturo Salgado v. Land O' Lakes, Inc.
Filing
55
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/6/2015. (Rooney, M)
1
[Counsel listed on next page]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
ARTURO SALGADO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
Case No. 1:13-CV-00798-LJO-SMS
Assigned to Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill and
the Honorable Sandra M. Snyder
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
LAND O’LAKES, INC., KOZY SHACK
ENTERPRISES, INC., and DOES 1-25,
inclusive,
17
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION;
AND ORDER THEREON
Complaint Filed: April 12, 2013
FAC Filed: September 16, 2014
Defendants.
18
[To be decided by Hon. Sandra M. Snyder]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
2
3
4
NEAL J. FIALKOW (SBN: 74385)
LAW OFFICE OF NEAL J. FIALKOW INC.
215 North Marengo Avenue, Third Floor
Pasadena, CA 91101
Telephone: (626) 584-6060
Facsimile: (626) 584-2950
Email: njfialkow@sbcglobal.net
5
6
7
8
9
10
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
AARON C. GUNDZIK (SBN: 132137)
REBECCA G. GUNDZIK (SBN: 138446)
GARTENBERG GELFAND HAYTON LLP
801 S. Figueroa St., Suite 2170
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 542-2100
Facsimile: (213) 542-2101
Email: agundzik@gghslaw.com
Email: rgundzik@gghslaw.com
SAHAG MAJARIAN II (SBN: 146621)
LAW OFFICE OF SAHAG MAJARIAN, II
18250 Ventura Boulevard
Tarzana, CA 91356
Tel: 818-609-0807
Facsimile: (828) 609-0892
Email: sahagii@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTURO SALGADO
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOAN B. TUCKER FIFE (SBN: 144572)
jfife@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3900
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 591-1000
(415) 591-1400
EMILIE C. WOODHEAD (SBN: 240464)
ewoodhead@winston.com
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Telephone:
(213) 615-1700
Facsimile:
(213) 615-1750
Attorneys for Defendant
LAND O’LAKES, INC. and KOZY SHACK
ENTERPRISES, LLC (erroneously sued
and served as Kozy Shack Enterprises, Inc.)
2
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
Subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiff Arturo Salgado (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand,
2
and Defendants Land O’Lakes, Inc. and Kozy Shack Enterprises, LLC (“Defendants”)
3
(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the
4
following protective order:
5
I.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Action will likely involve production of confidential, proprietary, trade secret, or private information
8
for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than
9
litigating this matter would be warranted. The information and documentation likely to be sought
10
includes, not exclusively, putative class members’ personal contact information, compensation and
11
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
This is a putative wage and hour class action. Disclosure and discovery activity in this
7
Winston & Strawn LLP
6
payroll information, personnel records, employee data, and internal policies and procedures. The
12
parties now seek this Stipulated Protective Order from the Court based upon the status of this Action
13
as a putative class action on behalf of numerous individuals from whom it would be difficult or
14
impossible to seek permission or consent to enter into such stipulation with regard to their rights and
15
privacy and in compliance with the Court’s Order issued on December 18, 2014 (Dkt. 53).
16
The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket
17
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only
18
to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment
19
as confidential. The Parties further acknowledge that nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order
20
shall preclude either Party from asserting that a document is of such a confidential or private nature
21
that it should not be produced or that it should only be produced in redacted form, or from seeking a
22
protective order to preclude the production of certain documents. The Parties further acknowledge,
23
as set forth in section 10 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no automatic
24
entitlement to file confidential information under seal. Rather, the Parties must request leave of
25
Court to file documents under seal in compliance with the requirements of the United States
26
District Court, Eastern District of California, Local Rule 141.
27
II.
28
DEFINITIONS
2. 1
Action: means the above-captioned action pending in this Court, including any
3
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
related discovery pretrial, post-trial or appellate proceedings.
2
2.2
Confidential Information and Items: information (regardless of how generated,
3
stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil
4
Procedure 26(c); confidential or sensitive company proprietary business information; information
5
about current, past or prospective employees that is of a confidential or private nature, including
6
putative class members’ personal contact information protected by the right of privacy;
7
compensation and payroll information, personnel records, and employee data; internal policies and
8
procedures; and information involving proprietary, trade secrets, or confidential business or financial
9
information.
10
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
2.3
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (and their support
2.4
Customer: any individual who utilized Defendants’ services and is referenced in any
staff).
13
way and/or format pursuant to this Action, including, but not limited to, in deposition testimony,
14
documents produced by either Party, written discovery responses, and/or briefing.
15
2.5
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it
16
produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
17
CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
18
2.6
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium
19
or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, documents, electronic
20
data, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or
21
responses to discovery in this matter.
22
2.7
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
23
the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a
24
consultant in this Action and who is not a past or current employee of a Party or a Party’s
25
competitor, and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or
26
a Party’s competitor. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in
27
connection with this litigation.
28
2.8
“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” Information and Items: extremely
4
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
sensitive “Confidential Information and Items” of which the disclosure to another Party or Non-
2
Party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by less restrictive
3
means.
4
5
2.9
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party (as well as their support
2.10
Non-Party: any third party that produced or produces any material to a Party in
staff).
6
7
connection with this Action, regardless of whether those materials are produced voluntarily or in
8
response to a subpoena, or other form or informal discovery process.
9
10
2.11
represent or advise a Party in this Action (and their support staff).
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to
2.12
Party: any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel (and their support staff).
13
2.13
Privileged Material: all items or information, or portions of items or information,
14
regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
15
documents, electronic data, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are subject to the attorney-
16
client privilege and/or the work product doctrine.
17
18
2.14
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this Action.
19
2.15
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g.,
20
photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, organizing, storing,
21
retrieving data in any form or medium, etc.) and their employees and subcontractors.
2.16
22
Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
23
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Any
24
designation as confidential does not make section 6 below inapplicable.
2.17
25
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
26
Producing Party.
27
III.
28
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected
5
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
Material (as defined above), and Confidential Information and Items, but also any information
2
copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof,
3
plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or Counsel to or in court or in other
4
settings that might reveal Protected Material.
5
IV.
6
DURATION
Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this
7
Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
8
otherwise directs.
9
V.
10
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection: Each Party
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to
12
limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.
13
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. If it comes to a Party’s or a Non-
14
Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for
15
protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or Non-
16
Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
17
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations: Except as otherwise provided in this Order
18
(see, e.g., sections 2.8 and 2.16 above and the second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as
19
otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be
20
clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with
21
this Order requires:
22
(a)
For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions
23
or other pretrial or trial proceedings): The Producing Party to affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”
24
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” at the top, bottom or right
25
margin of each page that contains Protected Material or, alternatively, on the first page of a multi-
26
page document, if the entire document is protected. If only a portion or portions of the material on
27
a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party should endeavor to identify the protected
28
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and specify, for each portion, the
6
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
level of protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
2
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”).
3
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for
4
inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated
5
which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the
6
designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY
7
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the
8
documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents,
9
or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order; then, before producing the specified
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or
11
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) at the top, bottom or right margin
12
of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a
13
page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also should endeavor to identify the protected
14
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). Where large amounts of data are
15
produced electronically on a CD-rom or disk, it is sufficient to label the CD-rom or disk itself
16
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Under
17
such circumstances, the entirety of the data contained on the CD-rom or disk shall be treated as if
18
each individual document resident thereon were so marked, and any excerpts printed from such
19
electronically stored data shall be identified by the Party using the excerpt as “CONFIDENTIAL”
20
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as appropriate.
21
(b)
For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings:
22
The Party or Non-Party shall designate the testimony or identify on the record, before the close of
23
the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any
24
portions of the testimony that qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
25
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of
26
testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the
27
testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or Non-Party designating the testimony may
28
invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to identify the
7
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of
2
protection being asserted (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
3
EYES ONLY”) within 30 days of the court reporter’s mailing of the transcript or within 30 days
4
after entry of this Order, whichever is later. Only those portions that are appropriately designated
5
for protection shall be covered by the provisions of this Order.
6
Transcript pages containing Protected Material and Confidential Information and
7
Items must be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page
8
the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,”
9
as instructed by the Party or Non-Party offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the
10
testimony.
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
(c)
For information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any
12
other tangible items: The Producing Party to affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
13
container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL”
14
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the
15
information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, should
16
identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
17
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
18
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
19
designate qualified information or items as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
20
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to
21
secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as
22
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” after the
23
material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation,
24
must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
25
provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.
26
5.4
Past Designations. The Parties have a right to secure protection under this Order for
27
qualified material that has been produced or generated in the course of this Action prior to the
28
enactment of this Order, if the qualified material is appropriately designated as
8
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
2
5.5
Customer Identification. The Parties shall identify by initials only any and all
3
Customers referenced in any and all materials exchanged in or created pursuant to this Action,
4
including but not limited to deposition testimony, written discovery, and documents produced.
5
The parties shall agree to redact all but the initials of customers from any documents or transcripts
6
before filing such materials in the public record.
7
VI.
8
9
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s
confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive
11
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly
12
after the original designation is disclosed.
13
6.2
Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s
14
confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring with
15
Counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for
16
its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party
17
an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no
18
change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging
19
Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has first engaged in this
20
meet and confer process.
21
6.3
Judicial Intervention. If the Parties are not able to agree during the meet and confer
22
process, then either Party may file and serve a motion pursuant to the local rules of this Court.
23
The Party asserting the claim of confidentiality or privilege shall bear the burden of proof on that
24
issue. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the
25
movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph
26
and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was
27
given in the meet and confer dialogue. The failure by any Party to meet and confer in good faith
28
before seeking the Court’s intervention shall be sufficient grounds, in and of itself, for the Court to
9
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
2
rule against that Party.
6.4
Until the Court rules on the challenge, all Parties shall continue to afford the
3
material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s
4
designation.
VII. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION AND ITEMS
5
6
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to
9
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Stipulated Protective Order.
10
When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of
11
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
8
Winston & Strawn LLP
7
section 12 below (FINAL DISPOSITION).
12
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in
13
a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Stipulated
14
Protective Order.
15
7.2
Disclosure of Confidential Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the
16
court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose information
17
or items designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
18
19
7.2.1 the Receiving Party’s Counsel of record in this Action, House Counsel and
their internal support staff;
20
7.2.2 the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party (other than
21
those covered by subsection 7.2.1 above) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this
22
litigation;
23
7.2.3 Experts (as defined in this Stipulated Protective Order) of the Receiving
24
Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
25
“Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Appendix A);
26
7.2.4 the Court and its personnel;
27
7.2.5 court reporters, their staff, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is
28
reasonably necessary for this litigation;
10
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
7.2.6 during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is
2
reasonably necessary. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that
3
reveal Protected Material and Confidential Information and Items must be separately bound by the
4
court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated
5
Protective Order; and
6
7
7.2.7 the author of the document or the original source of the information.
7.3
Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
8
Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the
9
Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose information or items designated “HIGHLY
10
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
7.3.1 the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, House Counsel and their internal
support staff;
13
7.3.2 the Court and its personnel;
14
7.3.3 the author of the document or the original source of the information; and
15
7.3.4 witnesses, Experts, or Professional Vendors in this litigation, provided,
16
however, that the Receiving Party will disclose to the Producing Party its intention to share the
17
particular document(s) with the witness at least ten days in advance before showing the witness,
18
Experts, or Professional Vendors the document(s), so that the Producing Party may seek
19
intervention by the Court prior to disclosure.
20
VIII. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
LITIGATION
21
22
If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that
23
would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
24
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the
25
Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately,
26
and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification
27
must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.
28
The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the
11
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the
2
subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must
3
deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the party in the other action that
4
caused the subpoena or order to issue.
5
The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of
6
this Stipulated Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to
7
try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued.
8
The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court
9
of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
11
Winston & Strawn LLP
10
IX.
12
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ITEMS
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
13
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective
14
Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the
15
unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c)
16
inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this
17
Stipulated Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Agreement to
18
Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Appendix A.
19
20
X.
21
FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND
ITEMS
No Party may file in the public record any Protected Material, unless: (1) the Party has
22
obtained prior written permission from the Designating Party; (2) the Party is filing the documents
23
pursuant to a Court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons; or (3) the Party
24
moves the Court for an order sealing such documents upon a showing of good cause in compliance
25
with the requirements of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Local
26
Rules 140 and 141.
27
XI.
28
PRIVILEGED MATERIAL
The Parties shall be permitted but not obligated to review materials for privilege and/or
12
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
work product protection prior to producing them in this matter. If a Producing Party discovers that
2
it has produced Privileged Material, it may notify the Receiving Party, which will promptly
3
destroy or return all copies of such Privileged Material. Furthermore, if the Receiving Party has
4
already disclosed the Privileged Material prior to receiving this notice, the Receiving Party must
5
take reasonable steps to retrieve the materials or ensure their destruction. Unless otherwise agreed
6
by the Parties in writing, no Party shall be permitted to retain Privileged Material after receiving
7
notification under this section, even if the Parties dispute the privilege and/or work product status
8
of the materials. If the Parties subsequently agree or the Court orders that such materials should
9
be disclosed, the Producing Party will produce new copies of the materials.
10
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
XII.
FINAL DISPOSITION
Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty days
12
after the final termination of this Action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material
13
to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies,
14
abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the
15
Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party
16
may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected
17
Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the
18
Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day
19
deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was
20
returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies,
21
abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected
22
Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all
23
pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product,
24
even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or
25
constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in section 4
26
(DURATION) above.
27
XIII. PUTATIVE CLASS MEMBER CONTACT INFORMATION
28
13.1 Attorneys’ Eyes Only. Any contact information of putative class members that
13
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
Defendants provide to Plaintiff’s Counsel, whether in response to a Court order or otherwise in this
2
litigation, will be designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”, and
3
will be used only for the purposes of this litigation. Putative class members shall retain a valid
4
privacy interest in their contact information unless they personally waive it.
5
13.2
Initial Contact. During any and all initial contact that Plaintiff’s Counsel has with
6
any and all putative class members, Plaintiff’s Counsel must inform them that Defendants were
7
compelled by court order to disclose their contact information, that the communication is highly
8
confidential, and include contact information of Defendants’ Counsel, accompanied by a statement
9
that Defendants’ Counsel does not represent putative class members.
10
13.3
Filed Under Seal. Plaintiff’s Counsel shall not file with the Court or make any other
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
public filing that sets forth putative class members’ contact information. Any filing requiring any
12
putative class members’ contact information shall be filed under seal.
13
13.4
Destruction. After the litigation terminates, Plaintiff’s Counsel shall either return the
14
list of putative class member contact information to Defendants’ Counsel —keeping no separate
15
physical or electronic copies—or destroy any and all lists or documents that include putative class
16
members’ contact information.
17
XIV. MISCELLANEOUS
18
19
20
14.1
Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order abridges the
right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.
14.2
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Stipulated
21
Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or
22
producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective
23
Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to the use of any of the
24
material covered by this Stipulated Protective Order at trial, in evidence or otherwise.
25
26
27
28
14
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
3
Dated: January 5, 2015
4
GARTENBERG GELFAND HAYTON LLP
By: /s/ Neal J. Fialkow (filed with permission)
Neal J. Fialkow
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Arturo Salgado, Individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: January 5, 2015
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
10
By: /s/ Joan B. Tucker Fife
Joan B. Tucker Fife
Attorneys for Defendants
LAND O’LAKES, INC. and KOZY SHACK
ENTERPRISES LLC
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: 1/6/2015
19
By: /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
APPENDIX A
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
FRESNO DIVISION
6
7
ARTURO SALGADO, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
8
Case No. 1:13-cv-00798-LJO-SMS
Assigned to Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill and
the Honorable Sandra M. Snyder
Plaintiff,
9
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
10
333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
Winston & Strawn LLP
11
LAND O’LAKES, INC., KOZY SHACK
ENTERPRISES, INC., and DOES 1-25,
inclusive,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
By signing this document, I hereby certify that I have read the Stipulated Protective Order
(“Order”) in the above-captioned case. I understand the responsibilities and obligations the Order
imposes on persons viewing the material encompassed by the Order, and I agree to be bound by all
of the provisions of the Order, so as to enable me to view the material encompassed by the Order. I
understand that any violation of the Order by me or anyone acting under my direction may subject
me to penalties for contempt of Court and/or other relief sought by a Party to the above-captioned
matter. I hereby consent to the personal and subject matter jurisdiction over me by the Court for
purposes of enforcing my agreement here.
Dated:
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Name (Printed)
___________________________________
Address
27
28
16
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00798–LJO-SMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?